I'm with you on EESTOR. Been watching these guys for a while myself. On Oct 13, 2014 9:53 AM, "Chuck McCown via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have been holding my breath for about 5 years on this. I almost gave > up hope. I am still holding my breath for EESTOR as well. I actually own > Zenn Motor Company stock... > > *From:* Glen Waldrop via Af <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2014 8:52 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Booyah, I still believe > > I'm not holding my breath, but I am keeping an eye on this. > > Interesting, if nothing else. Potentially life changing if legit. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Chuck Bartosch via Af <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2014 9:47 AM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Booyah, I still believe > > Yeah, the actual hourly production stuck me as not reactor sized to say > the least...but also impossible to be an artifact if there's the slightest > degree of competency involved. I can't bring myself to say I'm hopeful-but > I'd love love love to be wrong here. > > Chuck > > Sent from my iPad > > On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Adam Moffett via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1.5 megawatt-hours. I think they chose that number for the shock and > awe value. > > If it was producing the same amount of power continuously over 32 days > that would mean 3.9kw. Similar to some portable generators. They also > report net power production of 2.3kw, which doesn't jive with the > 1.5megawatt hours in 32 days. Apparently some energy input is required to > keep it running. > > I remain a hopeful skeptic. > > > On 10/13/2014 9:44 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af wrote: > > 1 gram of fuel produced 1.5 MEGAWATTS of power over 32 days? Am I reading > that right? > > Holy shit! > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/191754-cold-fusion-reactor-verified-by-third-party-researchers-seems-to-have-1-million-times-the-energy-density-of-gasoline >> > > > >
