Travis, are you getting bored at your current job? Lol!! Great to see you active in the list!
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr On 10/15/14, 4:14 PM, "Travis Johnson via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >The other issue is p2p traffic between two people on the same AP.... and >if you are doing bandwidth shaping in your router, even at the tower, >you will never see these packets. Or in the case the original poster >asked about, that customer could keep a high-def window open of all >their video cameras at the other location, using 3-4Mbps of constant >traffic, and you would never see it. > >Travis > >On 10/15/2014 1:48 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote: >> When you forward SM-to-SM traffic upstream, there's nothing the router >> can do about it. Put the two locations on different IP subnets so that >> traffic between the two has to be routed. Or turn off SM isolation. >> >> I leave SM isolation off because I'm not that paranoid. The biggest >> risk is broadcast/multicast crap flying around. So use the SM uplink >> broadcast/multicast rate limiting. This is one of the best features of >> Canopy, IMO. >> >> On 10/15/2014 2:23 PM, Christopher Tyler via Af wrote: >>> We have a customer that has two SM's on the same AP at separate >>> physical locations (home and office). The have a DVR at each location >>> that they want to view. Everything is configured properly on their >>> end to view the DVR's on port 80 through their routers. Problem is >>> that we have SM isolation turned on with option 2 to forward packets >>> upstream and they want to see the home when at the office and the >>> office when at home. >>> >>> So I set up a mangle rule in my Mikortik to mark the packets with a >>> routing mark based on the SRC and DST addresses, and then used a >>> static route for anything what that mark and send it back to the AP >>> port. It doesn't work, what am I doing wrong, any suggestions short >>> of disabling SM isolation? >>> >>> >> >> >
