Yeah, SaaS is great for the company that owns it, not so great for everyone else.
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Travis Johnson via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope... mainly SaaS companies and real estate. Best of both worlds. :) > > Travis > > On 10/15/2014 3:40 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote: > >> Someone told me you were getting into manufacturing�� >> >> >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> President >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> www.aeronetpr.com >> @aeronetpr >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 10/15/14, 5:31 PM, "Travis Johnson via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It just depends on the day... :) >>> >>> Involved in 11 companies now, and looking at a 12th. Always stuff going >>> on. LOL >>> >>> Travis >>> >>> On 10/15/2014 3:16 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote: >>> >>>> Travis, are you getting bored at your current job? Lol!! >>>> >>>> Great to see you active in the list! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Gino A. Villarini >>>> President >>>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>>> www.aeronetpr.com >>>> @aeronetpr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/15/14, 4:14 PM, "Travis Johnson via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The other issue is p2p traffic between two people on the same AP.... >>>>> and >>>>> if you are doing bandwidth shaping in your router, even at the tower, >>>>> you will never see these packets. Or in the case the original poster >>>>> asked about, that customer could keep a high-def window open of all >>>>> their video cameras at the other location, using 3-4Mbps of constant >>>>> traffic, and you would never see it. >>>>> >>>>> Travis >>>>> >>>>> On 10/15/2014 1:48 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> When you forward SM-to-SM traffic upstream, there's nothing the router >>>>>> can do about it. Put the two locations on different IP subnets so that >>>>>> traffic between the two has to be routed. Or turn off SM isolation. >>>>>> >>>>>> I leave SM isolation off because I'm not that paranoid. The biggest >>>>>> risk is broadcast/multicast crap flying around. So use the SM uplink >>>>>> broadcast/multicast rate limiting. This is one of the best features of >>>>>> Canopy, IMO. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/15/2014 2:23 PM, Christopher Tyler via Af wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a customer that has two SM's on the same AP at separate >>>>>>> physical locations (home and office). The have a DVR at each location >>>>>>> that they want to view. Everything is configured properly on their >>>>>>> end to view the DVR's on port 80 through their routers. Problem is >>>>>>> that we have SM isolation turned on with option 2 to forward packets >>>>>>> upstream and they want to see the home when at the office and the >>>>>>> office when at home. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I set up a mangle rule in my Mikortik to mark the packets with a >>>>>>> routing mark based on the SRC and DST addresses, and then used a >>>>>>> static route for anything what that mark and send it back to the AP >>>>>>> port. It doesn't work, what am I doing wrong, any suggestions short >>>>>>> of disabling SM isolation? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
