Someone told me you were getting into manufacturingŠŠ
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr On 10/15/14, 5:31 PM, "Travis Johnson via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >It just depends on the day... :) > >Involved in 11 companies now, and looking at a 12th. Always stuff going >on. LOL > >Travis > >On 10/15/2014 3:16 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote: >> Travis, are you getting bored at your current job? Lol!! >> >> Great to see you active in the list! >> >> >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> President >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> www.aeronetpr.com >> @aeronetpr >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 10/15/14, 4:14 PM, "Travis Johnson via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The other issue is p2p traffic between two people on the same AP.... >>>and >>> if you are doing bandwidth shaping in your router, even at the tower, >>> you will never see these packets. Or in the case the original poster >>> asked about, that customer could keep a high-def window open of all >>> their video cameras at the other location, using 3-4Mbps of constant >>> traffic, and you would never see it. >>> >>> Travis >>> >>> On 10/15/2014 1:48 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote: >>>> When you forward SM-to-SM traffic upstream, there's nothing the router >>>> can do about it. Put the two locations on different IP subnets so that >>>> traffic between the two has to be routed. Or turn off SM isolation. >>>> >>>> I leave SM isolation off because I'm not that paranoid. The biggest >>>> risk is broadcast/multicast crap flying around. So use the SM uplink >>>> broadcast/multicast rate limiting. This is one of the best features of >>>> Canopy, IMO. >>>> >>>> On 10/15/2014 2:23 PM, Christopher Tyler via Af wrote: >>>>> We have a customer that has two SM's on the same AP at separate >>>>> physical locations (home and office). The have a DVR at each location >>>>> that they want to view. Everything is configured properly on their >>>>> end to view the DVR's on port 80 through their routers. Problem is >>>>> that we have SM isolation turned on with option 2 to forward packets >>>>> upstream and they want to see the home when at the office and the >>>>> office when at home. >>>>> >>>>> So I set up a mangle rule in my Mikortik to mark the packets with a >>>>> routing mark based on the SRC and DST addresses, and then used a >>>>> static route for anything what that mark and send it back to the AP >>>>> port. It doesn't work, what am I doing wrong, any suggestions short >>>>> of disabling SM isolation? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >
