Detect wireless fade and automatically route traffic to the most
efficient path. You can't do that with mpls-te, and you can't get as low
as a latency as these things have even with fastpath.
That's the shame of it, had they finished it it would have been a great
product, although they used the "wrong" base technology. It should have
been built on SBP or TRILL to allow for the traditional mesh design,
instead of ITU G.3082v2 which requires rings.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/16/2014 08:09 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af wrote:
Solution in search of a problem. What did it claim to do that you
can't do with a properly designed OSPF + BGP + MPLS (and VRF) capable
network?
Then again, I don't use Mikrotik routers, I use power hungry Cisco or
Juniper gear so I don't have to deal with Mikrotik's wonky
implementation of BGP and MPLS.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We pulled it off our network last week. Bunch of money down the drain.
Not happy with the way Accedian handled this, on multiple fronts.
It's not like they were strapped for cash.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/16/2014 04:32 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
We are going �to toss them
Gino A. Villarini
@gvillarini
On Oct 16, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Chris Wright via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
1.2.8.6_21016 released in June of this year.
http://forum.performantnetworks.com/threads/2015.1438/
�
Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless <http://www.velociter.net/>
�
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Matthew
Jenkins via Af
*Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 3:20 PM
*To:* Timothy D. McNabb via Af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes
�
I have a tub of equipment I really wanted to deploy. It's not
being actively developed, so I have not deployed it. Are you
running the latest software?
-------- Original message --------
From: "Timothy D. McNabb via Af" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: 10/16/2014 1:58 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes
Does anyone here on the list use Performant Nurons/Mind
combination? What did you find worked best?
�
-Tim
�
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chris
Wright via Af
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:00 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes
�
We�ve been sitting on a Performant Mind and four Nurons for
almost a year now. They sat for six months, then I spent another
six months tinkering with them here and there. Regardless of
their EOL, we�re looking to implement � but I�m running
into the silliest of issues. I can�t even get traffic from the
Mind to a Nuron to pass without 20% packet loss. This is without
any routing, wireless backhauls, nothing. Just a VLAN-tagged NIC
plugged straight into the Mind, Ethernet from Mind to a Nuron
(where the vlan �pops�), then Ethernet to a second computer.
�
I�ve replaced the SFP adapters, the nuron, and verified none
of the Ethernet cables are bad by literally coupling them all
down a line and going straight from computer 1 to computer 2. No
issue there.
�
This, combined with the fact that this stuff is going to be EOL
in three years, is maddening. My boss was under the impression
that this should be able to seamlessly integrate into our star
topology (nuron at every tower making a ring), but we can�t
even get basic LAN functions to work reliably.
�
Chris Wright
Velociter Wireless <http://www.velociter.net/>
�
