Detect wireless fade and automatically route traffic to the most efficient path. You can't do that with mpls-te
right, you want radios that will do link state propagation to the router for that, which most carrier grade FDD backhauls will do. When a link fades below a certain threshold, turn off the interface so that from the perspective of two routers operating an OSPF /30 between two gigE interfaces, it looks like a cut cable. Thereby causing traffic to take another path. On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > Detect wireless fade and automatically route traffic to the most > efficient path. You can't do that with mpls-te, and you can't get as low > as a latency as these things have even with fastpath. > > That's the shame of it, had they finished it it would have been a great > product, although they used the "wrong" base technology. It should have > been built on SBP or TRILL to allow for the traditional mesh design, instead > of ITU G.3082v2 which requires rings. > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > On 10/16/2014 08:09 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af wrote: > > Solution in search of a problem. What did it claim to do that you can't > do with a properly designed OSPF + BGP + MPLS (and VRF) capable network? > > Then again, I don't use Mikrotik routers, I use power hungry Cisco or > Juniper gear so I don't have to deal with Mikrotik's wonky implementation > of BGP and MPLS. > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We pulled it off our network last week. Bunch of money down the drain. >> >> Not happy with the way Accedian handled this, on multiple fronts. It's >> not like they were strapped for cash. >> >> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer >> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com >> On 10/16/2014 04:32 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote: >> >> We are going �to toss them >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> @gvillarini >> >> >> >> On Oct 16, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Chris Wright via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 1.2.8.6_21016 released in June of this year. >> http://forum.performantnetworks.com/threads/2015.1438/ >> >> � >> >> Chris Wright >> >> Velociter Wireless <http://www.velociter.net/> >> >> � >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Matthew Jenkins via Af >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 3:20 PM >> *To:* Timothy D. McNabb via Af >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes >> >> � >> >> I have a tub of equipment I really wanted to deploy. It's not being >> actively developed, so I have not deployed it. Are you running the latest >> software? >> >> >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: "Timothy D. McNabb via Af" <[email protected]> >> Date: 10/16/2014 1:58 PM (GMT-07:00) >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes >> >> Does anyone here on the list use Performant Nurons/Mind combination? >> What did you find worked best? >> >> � >> >> -Tim >> >> � >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Chris Wright via Af >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:00 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Accedian/Performant/R-Flo woes >> >> � >> >> We�ve been sitting on a Performant Mind and four Nurons for almost a >> year now. They sat for six months, then I spent another six months >> tinkering with them here and there. Regardless of their EOL, we�re >> looking to implement � but I�m running into the silliest of issues. I >> can�t even get traffic from the Mind to a Nuron to pass without 20% >> packet loss. This is without any routing, wireless backhauls, nothing. Just >> a VLAN-tagged NIC plugged straight into the Mind, Ethernet from Mind to a >> Nuron (where the vlan �pops�), then Ethernet to a second computer. >> >> � >> >> I�ve replaced the SFP adapters, the nuron, and verified none of the >> Ethernet cables are bad by literally coupling them all down a line and >> going straight from computer 1 to computer 2. No issue there. >> >> � >> >> This, combined with the fact that this stuff is going to be EOL in three >> years, is maddening. My boss was under the impression that this should be >> able to seamlessly integrate into our star topology (nuron at every tower >> making a ring), but we can�t even get basic LAN functions to work >> reliably. >> >> � >> >> Chris Wright >> >> Velociter Wireless <http://www.velociter.net/> >> >> � >> >> >> > >
