When it comes to gain, there ain’t no free lunch.

From: Josh Reynolds via Af 
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 5:30 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Random thought

The horn does have some modest advantages. Moving to a reflector would remove 
those advantages completely.

Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com

On 10/19/2014 04:22 PM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:

  Just leave the horn off and aim the horn connection at a reflector.� All 
the gain you want.� Send me a radio and I will make a reflector holder for it.
  �
  From: Josh Reynolds via Af 
  Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 2:54 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Random thought
  �
  I have been talking with Martin & JT quite a bit. They are now working on a 
version of the radio adapters for the inner-feed that are shielded.

  I also asked to see if we could get some slightly larger gain models, say 
3-5db more. I was told it probably would make the horns too big, but that they 
would go back and check.

  Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
  SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com

  On 10/19/2014 06:17 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:

    Those horns looks sexy!!!

    Gino A. Villarini 
    @gvillarini
    �
    �

    On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> wrote:


      Right, but you can't expect any serious penetration with only them.

      I am considering special plans that only apply to the subdivisions 
immediately around my suburban water towers. I could get something like the new 
RF Elements horns and have some crazy downtilt so that my signal doesn't go 
further out than 2 miles. That high elevation will help out with that much 
downtilt. Now my fastest two plans are 4 megs for $60 and 10 megs for $100. 
I've been considering doubling the speed across the board, but I may need to 
revisit that offering to see how well it stacks up against them.




      -----
      Mike Hammett
      Intelligent Computing Solutions
      http://www.ics-il.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: "Tyler Treat via Af" <[email protected]>
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:15:14 AM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Random thought

      Yea but there will always be a subset of individuals who opt for a third 
option, be it for reliability, customer service, whatever. � �People hate 
the duopoly. � 


      ___________________________
      Mangled by my iPhone.
      ___________________________

      Tyler Treat
      Corn Belt Technologies, Inc. 

      [email protected]
      ___________________________


      > On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:08 AM, Seth Mattinen via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
      > 
      >> On 10/18/14, 7:57 AM, Paul Conlin via Af wrote:
      >> Those stupid fast speeds sure do make it harder to get face time with
      >> potential customers however. Cable COs are making 25 Mbps the new base.
      > 
      > 
      > The base is 60 meg here.
      > 
      > ~Seth

      �



Reply via email to