True.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/19/2014 04:31 PM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
When it comes to gain, there ain�t no free lunch.
*From:* Josh Reynolds via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Sunday, October 19, 2014 5:30 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Random thought
The horn does have some modest advantages. Moving to a reflector would
remove those advantages completely.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/19/2014 04:22 PM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote:
Just leave the horn off and aim the horn connection at a
reflector.� All the gain you want.� Send me a radio and I will
make a reflector holder for it.
�
*From:* Josh Reynolds via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Sunday, October 19, 2014 2:54 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Random thought
�
I have been talking with Martin & JT quite a bit. They are now
working on a version of the radio adapters for the inner-feed that
are shielded.
I also asked to see if we could get some slightly larger gain models,
say 3-5db more. I was told it probably would make the horns too big,
but that they would go back and check.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/19/2014 06:17 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
Those horns looks sexy!!!
Gino A. Villarini
@gvillarini
�
�
On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Right, but you can't expect any serious penetration with only them.
I am considering special plans that only apply to the subdivisions
immediately around my suburban water towers. I could get something
like the new RF Elements horns and have some crazy downtilt so that
my signal doesn't go further out than 2 miles. That high elevation
will help out with that much downtilt. Now my fastest two plans are
4 megs for $60 and 10 megs for $100. I've been considering doubling
the speed across the board, but I may need to revisit that offering
to see how well it stacks up against them.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Tyler Treat via Af" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:15:14 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Random thought
Yea but there will always be a subset of individuals who opt for a
third option, be it for reliability, customer service, whatever.
� �People hate the duopoly. �
___________________________
Mangled by my iPhone.
___________________________
Tyler Treat
Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
___________________________
> On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:08 AM, Seth Mattinen via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/14, 7:57 AM, Paul Conlin via Af wrote:
>> Those stupid fast speeds sure do make it harder to get face time
with
>> potential customers however. Cable COs are making 25 Mbps the
new base.
>
>
> The base is 60 meg here.
>
> ~Seth
�
