Time, date, speed test results, IP address, etc. On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Dennis Burgess via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> What kind of data do you want? We were thinking a simple brandable > speedtest site.. > > > > Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. > > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> – 314-735-0270 – > www.linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of *Tushar > Patel via Af > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:09 AM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? > > > > I would say one time price of about $500, all data saved on local mysql. > May charge operator for hosting if they want to do it that way. If you do > come up with new upgrade then charge about $250 for upgrade. > > > > Thanks, > > Tushar Patel > > 512-257-1077 > > www.westernbroadband.com > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of *Dennis > Burgess via Af > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:28 AM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? > > > > It was, not anymore. What would be a good cost that you would pay for? > i.e. I was thinking of my team programming up one for WISPs J > > > > Dennis Burgess, Link Technologies, Inc. > 314-735-0270 > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of *Jason > McKemie via Af > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:38 PM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? > > > > Per the Mikrotik forums it looks like it is proprietary. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Bill Prince via Af <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Isn't the bandwidth test built into Mikrotik a variant of iperf? > > bp > > On 10/21/2014 7:00 PM, Keefe John via Af wrote: > > We found speedtest.net to be very unreliable even though we have a server > hosted in our datacenter. We also run speedtest mini and it is not very > reliable, especially for 25mbps or greater. Iperf, however, works every > time. > > On 10/21/2014 7:09 PM, Jon Auer via Af wrote: > > FWIW at one time we had three peers (no open internet/upstream to worry > about) running speedtest.net servers and still saw a lot of variation in > performance. > > The server on a network run by a world-famous optimization nerd reported > much higher speeds and more consistent results than the one run by the > fellow WISP or the one run by a IT consultant... > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > If your upstreams suck, your customer's speedtests should reflect > that.... and be addressed. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Timothy D. McNabb via Af" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Sent: *Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:15:06 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? > > I hate to necro an old thread, but has anyone devised an alternative? > We’re looking at the same dilemma of our own speedtest. It’s always been > nice to have the Ookla speedtest not just in terms of performance, but the > ability to reference actual results as well (since customers sometimes > misinterpret the results). From the other speedtests mentioned ( > speedtest.io and openspeedtest) it appears that neither are something you > can install on a local machine. Our personal preference is so customers can > see what their speeds are within our control (the speedtest server is right > next to our upstreams). > > > > -Tim > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-bounces+tim > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-bounces%2Btim');>[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of > *Tushar > Patel via Af > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:55 PM > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? > > > > May be we will try that. But as a speedtest product from ookla, I am > surprised there isn't really good competing product in the market. One > would think there should be market for such product. No wonder they are > raising the price. > > Tushar > > > > > On Sep 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af" < > [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Why not just host a speedtest.net server and have your customers test to > it? > > > > -forrest > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Darren Shea via Af <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > We currently host our own speedtest server using Ookla's speedtest > technology, but Ookla is discontinuing the version we run, and > the licensing fees for the new version are very steep. I'm looking at > alternatives, such as OpenSpeedTest and speed.io, but would > like to get some feedback on these if anyone is using them. > > We once tried using Brandon Checkett's Fancy Speed Test, but the results > display was not really in line with what we wanted. > > Does anyone hosting their own, non-Ookla, speedtest server have some > success stories or horror stories about particular packages? > > > Thank you, > Darren > > > > > > > > > > > > >
