Forward and reverse traceroutes at the time of the test?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Jason McKemie via Af" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Wednesday, October 22, 2014 10:40:12 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
Time, date, speed test results, IP address, etc.
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Dennis Burgess via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What kind of data do you want? We were thinking a simple brandable
speedtest site..
Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc.
[email protected] – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net
<http://www.linktechs.net>
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tushar
Patel via Af
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:09 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
I would say one time price of about $500, all data saved on local
mysql. May charge operator for hosting if they want to do it that
way. If you do come up with new upgrade then charge about $250 for
upgrade.
Thanks,
Tushar Patel
512-257-1077
www.westernbroadband.com <http://www.westernbroadband.com/>
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Dennis
Burgess via Af
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:28 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
It was, not anymore. What would be a good cost that you would pay
for? i.e. I was thinking of my team programming up one for WISPs J
Dennis Burgess, Link Technologies, Inc.
314-735-0270
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason
McKemie via Af
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:38 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
Per the Mikrotik forums it looks like it is proprietary.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Bill Prince via Af <[email protected]>
wrote:
Isn't the bandwidth test built into Mikrotik a variant of iperf?
bp
On 10/21/2014 7:00 PM, Keefe John via Af wrote:
We found speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net> to be very
unreliable even though we have a server hosted in our
datacenter. We also run speedtest mini and it is not very
reliable, especially for 25mbps or greater. Iperf, however,
works every time.
On 10/21/2014 7:09 PM, Jon Auer via Af wrote:
FWIW at one time we had three peers (no open
internet/upstream to worry about) running speedtest.net
<http://speedtest.net> servers and still saw a lot of
variation in performance.
The server on a network run by a world-famous optimization
nerd reported much higher speeds and more consistent
results than the one run by the fellow WISP or the one run
by a IT consultant...
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Mike Hammett via Af
<[email protected]> wrote:
If your upstreams suck, your customer's speedtests should
reflect that.... and be addressed.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Timothy D. McNabb via Af" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:15:06 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
I hate to necro an old thread, but has anyone devised an
alternative? We’re looking at the same dilemma of our own
speedtest. It’s always been nice to have the Ookla
speedtest not just in terms of performance, but the
ability to reference actual results as well (since
customers sometimes misinterpret the results). From the
other speedtests mentioned (speedtest.io
<http://speedtest.io> and openspeedtest) it appears that
neither are something you can install on a local machine.
Our personal preference is so customers can see what their
speeds are within our control (the speedtest server is
right next to our upstreams).
-Tim
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]]
*On Behalf Of *Tushar Patel via Af
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:55 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements?
May be we will try that. But as a speedtest product from
ookla, I am surprised there isn't really good competing
product in the market. One would think there should be
market for such product. No wonder they are raising the price.
Tushar
On Sep 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, "Forrest Christian (List
Account) via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:
Why not just host a speedtest.net
<http://speedtest.net> server and have your customers
test to it?
-forrest
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Darren Shea via Af
<[email protected]> wrote:
We currently host our own speedtest server using
Ookla's speedtest technology, but Ookla is
discontinuing the version we run, and
the licensing fees for the new version are very steep.
I'm looking at alternatives, such as OpenSpeedTest and
speed.io <http://speed.io>, but would
like to get some feedback on these if anyone is using
them.
We once tried using Brandon Checkett's Fancy Speed
Test, but the results display was not really in line
with what we wanted.
Does anyone hosting their own, non-Ookla, speedtest
server have some success stories or horror stories
about particular packages?
Thank you,
Darren
