I would be interested in this as well Dennis. $500 seems fair. -Tim
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tushar Patel via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? Speedtest site has to sit on our network, so we eliminate any problem on the net and can show customer that it is performing within our network fine. Branable is must. This is what ookla gives: CLIENT IP ADDRESS ,CLIENT LOCATION, TEST DATE SERVER ,[download]DOWNLOAD ,[upload]UPLOAD ,[latency]LATENCY ,USER AGENT Above is sufficient. Thanks, Tushar Patel 512-257-1077 www.westernbroadband.com<http://www.westernbroadband.com/> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:47 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? What kind of data do you want? We were thinking a simple brandable speedtest site.. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tushar Patel via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:09 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? I would say one time price of about $500, all data saved on local mysql. May charge operator for hosting if they want to do it that way. If you do come up with new upgrade then charge about $250 for upgrade. Thanks, Tushar Patel 512-257-1077 www.westernbroadband.com<http://www.westernbroadband.com/> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess via Af Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:28 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? It was, not anymore. What would be a good cost that you would pay for? i.e. I was thinking of my team programming up one for WISPs ☺ Dennis Burgess, Link Technologies, Inc. 314-735-0270 From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie via Af Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 10:38 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? Per the Mikrotik forums it looks like it is proprietary. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Bill Prince via Af <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Isn't the bandwidth test built into Mikrotik a variant of iperf? bp On 10/21/2014 7:00 PM, Keefe John via Af wrote: We found speedtest.net<http://speedtest.net> to be very unreliable even though we have a server hosted in our datacenter. We also run speedtest mini and it is not very reliable, especially for 25mbps or greater. Iperf, however, works every time. On 10/21/2014 7:09 PM, Jon Auer via Af wrote: FWIW at one time we had three peers (no open internet/upstream to worry about) running speedtest.net<http://speedtest.net> servers and still saw a lot of variation in performance. The server on a network run by a world-famous optimization nerd reported much higher speeds and more consistent results than the one run by the fellow WISP or the one run by a IT consultant... On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If your upstreams suck, your customer's speedtests should reflect that.... and be addressed. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> ________________________________ From: "Timothy D. McNabb via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 5:15:06 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? I hate to necro an old thread, but has anyone devised an alternative? We’re looking at the same dilemma of our own speedtest. It’s always been nice to have the Ookla speedtest not just in terms of performance, but the ability to reference actual results as well (since customers sometimes misinterpret the results). From the other speedtests mentioned (speedtest.io<http://speedtest.io> and openspeedtest) it appears that neither are something you can install on a local machine. Our personal preference is so customers can see what their speeds are within our control (the speedtest server is right next to our upstreams). -Tim From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+tim<mailto:af-bounces%2Btim>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Tushar Patel via Af Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:55 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest replacements? May be we will try that. But as a speedtest product from ookla, I am surprised there isn't really good competing product in the market. One would think there should be market for such product. No wonder they are raising the price. Tushar On Sep 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account) via Af" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Why not just host a speedtest.net<http://speedtest.net> server and have your customers test to it? -forrest On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Darren Shea via Af <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We currently host our own speedtest server using Ookla's speedtest technology, but Ookla is discontinuing the version we run, and the licensing fees for the new version are very steep. I'm looking at alternatives, such as OpenSpeedTest and speed.io<http://speed.io>, but would like to get some feedback on these if anyone is using them. We once tried using Brandon Checkett's Fancy Speed Test, but the results display was not really in line with what we wanted. Does anyone hosting their own, non-Ookla, speedtest server have some success stories or horror stories about particular packages? Thank you, Darren
