I believe LTE is a superior solution, but I haven't been convinced that the costs are worth it unless you're dealing with tons of low-bandwidth clients.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt via Af" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 3:57:50 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad LTE vs 450 3.65GHZ I hear mention of MU-MIMO in LTE. But to deploy MU-MIMO would it not require a multiple antennas in each sector with a very expensive LTE base station for each sector as well? On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Gino Villarini via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > If telrad adds carrier aggregation to its upcoming LTE support, then yes. > 10+10 is an option > > Gino A. Villarini > @gvillarini > > > >> On Nov 4, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Matt via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is anyone looking at both these options? Pros and cons of one vs >> other? Throughput, Sync, Interference, spectrum efficiency, cost etc? >> >> What I really wander is can you bond two non adjacent 10MHZ channels >> with Telrad to make a 20MHZ channel? I know you cannot with 450 and >> it might become very useful down the road. Right now with 450 and a >> perfect connection on a 20MHZ channel we can do around 80Mbps >> downstream per sector. With a 10MHZ channel and not so perfect >> connections that is really getting cut back. >> >> Also, right now we can do ABAB quite easily with 450 gear. With LTE >> can we do AAAA where spectrum is scarce?
