It's desperately needed. The PMP is a few years behind where they need to be to justify the cost.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tyler Treat via Af" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 10:35:22 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad LTE vs 450 3.65GHZ So the real question becomes, what is the 450 roadmap moving forward? What kind of shock and awe is on the horizon….? From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie via Af Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 9:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Telrad LTE vs 450 3.65GHZ The 450 is going to smoke the Telrad from a latency standpoint. This is a big downside to this gear IMO. If someone would optimize LTE for use in a fixed environment you could possibly get better latency, but I'm not seeing that happening. On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Matt via Af < [email protected] > wrote: Is anyone looking at both these options? Pros and cons of one vs other? Throughput, Sync, Interference, spectrum efficiency, cost etc? What I really wander is can you bond two non adjacent 10MHZ channels with Telrad to make a 20MHZ channel? I know you cannot with 450 and it might become very useful down the road. Right now with 450 and a perfect connection on a 20MHZ channel we can do around 80Mbps downstream per sector. With a 10MHZ channel and not so perfect connections that is really getting cut back. Also, right now we can do ABAB quite easily with 450 gear. With LTE can we do AAAA where spectrum is scarce?
