A 60 ghz solution using two 1000 mhz channels giving us 10 gbps full
duplex throughput would be awesome.
Keefe
On 12/10/2014 11:19 PM, Colin Stanners via Af wrote:
I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the
100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a
2.5gbit backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'd guess there's going to be... a least3 AirFiber products
released in the next 12-18 months.
If not sooner.
Now... what would those be?
Hrmmmmmmmmm.....
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 12/10/2014 08:07 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote:
I don’t know what you are talking about.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh
Reynolds via Af
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:05 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted..
I'm sure that AirFiber team (which they seem to keep expanding)
is silently sitting in their own little corner in Chicago doing
nothing.
:P
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 12/10/2014 07:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote:
I think the ePMP is going to run into the same problem all
the 802.11ac vendors are seeing with the new OOBE rules. The
450 is able to provide a better performance within the new
environment so there will still be a differentiator. The
only question if it’s worth the difference.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Stefan
Englhardt via Af
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45 PM
*To:* Josh Luthman via Af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted..
.AC is an upgrade to .N. Cambium has the choice to use it or
not. Others do. epmp competes with 450 right now but helps to
keep customers and applications where 450 does not meet the
price point.
*Von:*Josh Luthman via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 04:00
*An:* Josh Luthman via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether
Cambium would be
fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a
company do when
it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one
starts to outshine
the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark?
(mbps - even .AC
ePMP is unlikely to beat 450 in scalability / latency / etc).
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Englhardt via Af
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
> The answer is to release an epmp1000-ac.
>
>
> *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 01:39
> *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> I hope Cambium is listing on this point.
>
> Get rid of speed license and make it as unlimited radios at
10 meg price
> point.
>
> They are about to have more competition from lot of other
vendors too.
>
> Tushar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter
Kranz via Af
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:10 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted..
>
> > Yes no maybe.
>
> I think this is good news actually, as it is sure to light
the competitive
> fire under Cambium to get to feature parity and get rid of
speed licenses.
>
>
