plus force 110 is for epmp (as far as I'm aware) On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not even in the works. 2.4 is supposed to release q1 2015. The 5 GHz > force110 just came out. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, chuck--- via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Could be done but don’t they have a force 110 type of product for that? >> >> *From:* Sean Heskett via Af <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:13 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >> >> Hey beehive chuck, >> >> What about a stinger for the connectorized 3.65 SM similar to the 900mhz >> stingers??? >> >> It'd be nice to have a slip-on solution that has a gain between a bare SM >> and a dish. >> >> -sean >> >> On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I tried. The internal antenna coupled with the larger wavelength made >>> everything I tried impractical. I got 4-5 dB at most. Not worth building >>> the tooling. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof via Af >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:36 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >>> >>> I'm trying to find the response from somebody at Cambium when I asked >>> about >>> the feasibility of a CLIP for 3.65 GHz. I think it was something about >>> too >>> big and not enough gain. Obviously with the new case design you couldn't >>> just slip a 5 GHz Stinger or CLIP on a 3.65 GHz SM to see what happens. >>> But >>> I suspect something 50% bigger than the existing CLIP and with 6 dB gain >>> over a bare SM might make some people happy. Certainly it would be >>> cheaper >>> than an SMC plus a panel, and smaller than a reflector dish. >>> >>> Here's a scary thought, remember the LENS that weighed a ton? Make that >>> 50% >>> bigger and put it on the 3.65 SM which also weighs a ton, now you have 2 >>> tons. >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Jon Langeler via Af >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:19 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >>> >>> ITElite >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Dec 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Matt via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have a few places I need more gain then a bare 450 3.65 SM but >>>> cannot fit a reflector. Is there a small panel antenna that works >>>> with the 450 3.65 SM? >>>> >>> >>> >>>
