Any hope of a 2.4 ePMP Stinger?
chuck--- via Af wrote:
OK, was thinking ePMP for some reason... Forgot about the FSK style
case on the 3.65.
Perhaps something could be made for 3.65 but it is dual slant, right?
So if I embedded a patch array in a stinger case it will be expensive
due to being dual pol. I tried a simple reflector/subreflector
stinger approach and didn’t get anything worth having.
*From:* Sean Heskett via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 24, 2014 1:03 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
plus force 110 is for epmp (as far as I'm aware)
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Not even in the works. 2.4 is supposed to release q1 2015. The 5
GHz force110 just came out.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, chuck--- via Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Could be done but don’t they have a force 110 type of product
for that?
*From:* Sean Heskett via Af <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:13 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
Hey beehive chuck,
What about a stinger for the connectorized 3.65 SM similar to
the 900mhz stingers???
It'd be nice to have a slip-on solution that has a gain
between a bare SM and a dish.
-sean
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Chuck McCown via Af
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I tried. The internal antenna coupled with the larger
wavelength made everything I tried impractical. I got 4-5
dB at most. Not worth building the tooling.
-----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
I'm trying to find the response from somebody at Cambium
when I asked about
the feasibility of a CLIP for 3.65 GHz. I think it was
something about too
big and not enough gain. Obviously with the new case
design you couldn't
just slip a 5 GHz Stinger or CLIP on a 3.65 GHz SM to see
what happens. But
I suspect something 50% bigger than the existing CLIP and
with 6 dB gain
over a bare SM might make some people happy. Certainly it
would be cheaper
than an SMC plus a panel, and smaller than a reflector dish.
Here's a scary thought, remember the LENS that weighed a
ton? Make that 50%
bigger and put it on the 3.65 SM which also weighs a ton,
now you have 2
tons.
-----Original Message----- From: Jon Langeler via Af
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
ITElite
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Matt via Af
<[email protected]> wrote:
I have a few places I need more gain then a bare 450
3.65 SM but
cannot fit a reflector. Is there a small panel antenna
that works
with the 450 3.65 SM?
