Connectors don't care :) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 24, 2014 3:03 PM, "Sean Heskett via Af" <[email protected]> wrote:
> plus force 110 is for epmp (as far as I'm aware) > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Not even in the works. 2.4 is supposed to release q1 2015. The 5 GHz >> force110 just came out. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, chuck--- via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Could be done but don’t they have a force 110 type of product for >>> that? >>> >>> *From:* Sean Heskett via Af <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:13 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >>> >>> Hey beehive chuck, >>> >>> What about a stinger for the connectorized 3.65 SM similar to the >>> 900mhz stingers??? >>> >>> It'd be nice to have a slip-on solution that has a gain between a bare >>> SM and a dish. >>> >>> -sean >>> >>> On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Chuck McCown via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I tried. The internal antenna coupled with the larger wavelength made >>>> everything I tried impractical. I got 4-5 dB at most. Not worth building >>>> the tooling. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof via Af >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:36 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >>>> >>>> I'm trying to find the response from somebody at Cambium when I asked >>>> about >>>> the feasibility of a CLIP for 3.65 GHz. I think it was something about >>>> too >>>> big and not enough gain. Obviously with the new case design you >>>> couldn't >>>> just slip a 5 GHz Stinger or CLIP on a 3.65 GHz SM to see what >>>> happens. But >>>> I suspect something 50% bigger than the existing CLIP and with 6 dB gain >>>> over a bare SM might make some people happy. Certainly it would be >>>> cheaper >>>> than an SMC plus a panel, and smaller than a reflector dish. >>>> >>>> Here's a scary thought, remember the LENS that weighed a ton? Make >>>> that 50% >>>> bigger and put it on the 3.65 SM which also weighs a ton, now you have 2 >>>> tons. >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Jon Langeler via Af >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:19 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >>>> >>>> ITElite >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Dec 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Matt via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have a few places I need more gain then a bare 450 3.65 SM but >>>>> cannot fit a reflector. Is there a small panel antenna that works >>>>> with the 450 3.65 SM? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >
