Skybeam Colorado.
Shooting to a grain silo about 5 miles away with 2ft antennas. They will do the “tower” side… I got the non-pen off the old building today and moved over to the new this evening. Cableing tomorrow (and a 430 SM20 to fill in the gap to a closer tower while the licensing goes thru). I’d never engineer this link for a customer. Boy do I wish I had 18GHz here in Denver. Daniel White | Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: (303) 746-3590 Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darin Steffl Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 8:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous Who are you using for internet out there then and where is the microwave link going to? On Jan 17, 2015 7:26 AM, "Daniel White" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Weather has been weird in Denver. Last few weeks ice storms and sub-freezing temps all day. Today the high is 55 degrees… Monday they are saying 66 degrees. Last few days was the right time to move our warehouse. Today I get to install the Integra link at our new office – at least I won’t be freezing or dealing with snow! Daniel White | Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: (303) 746-3590 <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 11:52 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous Spring around here starts somewhere between mid-February and mid-June. Chicago sucks. Last week we had a low of -14F. Tomorrow it's supposed to be 45, but windy. On 1/16/2015 11:58 PM, Daniel White wrote: March/April is the target. Should be ready for spring build season regardless. Daniel White | Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: (303) 746-3590 <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 10:42 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous So when can we expect the integra-S Wide available in 11ghz? On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Daniel White <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I forgot about yours Cassidy! Anyways we keep them in stock now… not many but we do have a few available. Integra will be in 13GHz too… although I suspect 6/11/42/28 will win out first (and no you can’t use 42GHz in North America… but it is a new exciting band in Europe). Daniel White | Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: (303) 746-3590 <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Cassidy B. Larson Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 9:54 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous We have a 13GHz Lumina! :). Had a packed 11GHz site with not much available, and the site was outside of the exclusion zone so it fit the need. -c On Jan 16, 2015, at 9:38 PM, Daniel White <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: We sell a lot of 13GHz internationally… but there isn’t much market for it in North America… yet at least (or at least outside the STL world). <image001.jpg> Daniel White | Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: (303) 746-3590 <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Af [ <mailto:[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 9:09 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous I did a job for Teletronics back in 2004 in Bolivia and all the backhauls used 13 GHz. I think they were Alcatel and the N????? (Red letters) ones.. long ago... Jaime Solorza On Jan 16, 2015 8:52 PM, "Daniel White" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote: Depending on what you call 7GHz… yes. SAF calls it Upper 6GHz – but that falls into the 7GHz range. 13GHz is… but few use it. Only 13GHz WISP links I’m aware of are in the US Virgin Islands. Anywhere else, 11GHz is still open where 13GHz can be used. <image001.jpg> Daniel White | Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> (303) 746-3590 Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Af [mailto: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 7:43 AM To: Animal Farm Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous Are 7 8 and 13Ghz available in US for WISPs? Jaime Solorza On Jan 15, 2015 9:07 PM, "Mike Hammett" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote: I just actually dug up the numbers and actually, the LTE receive sensitivity that Patrick was talking about are within a dB or two of the SIAE datasheet I have open at 64 QAM. He then talks about 8.5 dB of additional receive gain via 4x4 and HARQ. *shrugs* Every dB helps. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> http://www.ics-il.com _____ From: "Daniel White" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:52:27 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous Licensed vendors can’t use many of the tricks unlicensed, or low frequency, vendors get to use. The space is regulated much differently. <http://127.0.0.1:36958/service/home/%7E/?auth=co&id=1de3965e-b725-4c61-b23b-9b05aabb2124:40252&part=2> Daniel White | Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> (303) 746-3590 Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] From: Af [mailto: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 7:54 AM To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous Well right, we need more bandwidth per link, but also that in many areas there's no links to be had, so we have to make do with what we have. For instance in that spot I'm working on the GigE links for, there's no 6 GHz, 11 GHz and only 2x horizontal 18 GHz licenses available. It's not exactly suburbia or HFT alley, either. I think the next step will have to be IP20 type solutions from more vendors. Patrick is talking all kinds of engineering finesse that lowers how much signal LTE needs to work well by like 10 - 15 dB. I wonder how much of that would help licensed links. The thought there is that having more signal to work with means that higher QAMs aren't as fragile as without that fanciness. Roadmap to 10G via licensed, anyone? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> _____ From: "Ken Hohhof" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:41:42 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous All good points, not sure they address Erich’s issue of needing more bandwidth per link without multiple antennas per link on the tower. I think he’s saying an IP20 class radio is too expensive, and over the next few years lots of us are going to need that kind of radio. From: <mailto:[email protected]> Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:27 AM To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous Pull all of the active licenses with old ass gear and feed their contact information to the vendors? ;-) Maybe newer gear for hte existing guys would cut down on how much they need. ;-) ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> _____ From: "Mike Hammett" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:25:39 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous 10 GHz unlicensed would help. I sometimes think the license protections are a bit excessive. Maybe loosen the geographic restrictions on 7 GHz and 13 GHz? Maybe some effort into getting 4 GHz and other legacy PtP bands opened back up? They don't have a ton of room and don't allow for huge channels, but some is better than none and maybe since the HFT guys care more about lower latency and less about throughput, they''ll build longer hops and leave our 11 and 6 gig alone? ;-) ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> _____ From: "Mike Hammett" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:18:58 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous You could drive around to all of the HFT sites and look for links that are no longer there, but still licensed. Document. Come back 30 days later and document again, submit to the FCC (or wherever Liz says is best) and have those licenses revoked. ;-) But yeah, I do like Ceragon's 4x4 setup. Two radio heads, four transmitters, two licenses, tons of bandwidth. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> _____ From: "Erich Kaiser" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:15:57 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous The conversation goes deeper. In several areas we are out of spectrum, it may be due to HFT or just plain out. So most WISPs if they have deployed Licensed, they have to deal with what spectrum they have. The question is, where do you see the licensed backhaul market in the next few years, are they just going to be adding qams or finding other creative ways to add capacity? I am not in the WISP business anymore so I have decided to try and focus on the things that drove me nuts to help others. Erich Kaiser North Central Tower Consulting <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Office: <tel:630-621-4804> 630-621-4804 Cell: <tel:630-777-9291> 630-777-9291 On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Daniel White < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote: Your issue is really then with promo’s and capacity keys – which is marketing and different ways to make revenue on a product. Just like the PtMP space, not all PtP vendors do capacity keys and play those games either. Daniel White <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590> (303) 746-3590 From: Af [mailto: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Erich Kaiser Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:47 PM To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Licensed backhaul pricing - still ridiculous >From my experience the price has not changed very much. Someone needs to take >the reigns on the market. Even with certain companies throwing you a promo >price, if you really look at it fully loaded, the price is still high for what >you get. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Jason McKemie < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote: I think we're already seeing it. They're not wifi chipset based radio kind of prices, but they can be found for less than half of what you could get them for just a few years ago. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Erich Kaiser < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote: After several years, when will we see Licensed radios come down in price? There is so much margin in these things. Its ridiculous....
