we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for us. It was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha.
not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen it. 2 cents -sean On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad. My Field Laptop, a Lenovo S10-3t, Atom > Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB Pages in a timely > manner. We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and 20-30 seconds > per screen refresh/menu change. Since I'm going to have to go to the boss, > and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field troubleshooting for > these new radios, what are the minimum system specs for a machine to view > the EPMP Screens? Unless Cambium is going to get their Web interface under > control as of Yesterday. > > They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not purchased > (something I still can't believe). I'd like to know who the > engineers/managers are who signed off on that design. I can only imaging > that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference table, > watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, all nodding > their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, the field > tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages to load so > they can look this pretty!!" > > I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL aspects of > product development out into the field. 40 seconds waiting for the page to > load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not when you have the > laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing rain trying to get > to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't linking up. I think that > every WISP on this list would be more than happy to host an engineer for a > day. Heck, even if they go into the parking lot and assemble it on the > tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get some idea of what we experience. > > I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a week in the > field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded instantly on any > device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and unmounted) with 1 gloved > hand. > > </rant> > Nate >
