less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem. The > interface takes too long when it first shows up. Maybe it's because it > gets all the information at once, maybe not. Don't care. I want it to be > more smooth and faster. > > My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for Android. The > interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that. > > Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's fine, but > it's just flat out wrong. I don't want to carry a big fat i7 laptop up the > tower when I could just simply use my phone. It works with Ubiquiti, FSK > Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should only make sense the one > product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of changing my devices > that work with the competitors products (as well as different products > under their portfolio). > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the ePMP >> page load slowly. >> >> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just trying to >> bring valid input to the discussion. >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine? This doesn't >>> even make sense. There are people with slower laptops that work with other >>> modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads slow. There's no >>> point in arguing peoples valid complaints. Are you trying to direct the >>> engineers attention to something else? >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then two maybe >>>> three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will work when I'm >>>> RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get home and post it >>>> up on YouTube. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>> >>>> Login takes forever. The first like 10-15 seconds just load and load >>>> and load. Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of page rendering. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for us. It >>>>> was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha. >>>>> >>>>> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen it. >>>>> >>>>> 2 cents >>>>> >>>>> -sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad. My Field Laptop, a Lenovo S10-3t, >>>>>> Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB Pages in a >>>>>> timely >>>>>> manner. We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and 20-30 seconds >>>>>> per screen refresh/menu change. Since I'm going to have to go to the >>>>>> boss, >>>>>> and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field troubleshooting for >>>>>> these new radios, what are the minimum system specs for a machine to view >>>>>> the EPMP Screens? Unless Cambium is going to get their Web interface >>>>>> under >>>>>> control as of Yesterday. >>>>>> >>>>>> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not >>>>>> purchased (something I still can't believe). I'd like to know who the >>>>>> engineers/managers are who signed off on that design. I can only imaging >>>>>> that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference table, >>>>>> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, all >>>>>> nodding >>>>>> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, the field >>>>>> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages to load so >>>>>> they can look this pretty!!" >>>>>> >>>>>> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL >>>>>> aspects of product development out into the field. 40 seconds waiting >>>>>> for >>>>>> the page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not when >>>>>> you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing rain >>>>>> trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't linking up. >>>>>> I think that every WISP on this list would be more than happy to host an >>>>>> engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the parking lot and >>>>>> assemble >>>>>> it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get some idea of what we >>>>>> experience. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a week in >>>>>> the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded instantly on >>>>>> any >>>>>> device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and unmounted) with 1 >>>>>> gloved >>>>>> hand. >>>>>> >>>>>> </rant> >>>>>> Nate >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
