Decade old habits are hard to break :) That said, the source links are in the posts.
On January 21, 2015 3:41:37 AM AKST, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >Anyone that links to SlashDot goes down a peg or two... it's the more >useless version of Reddit. > >That said, yes, most anything you think is secure really isn't. >Wikileaks from a few weeks ago showed NSA documents on how easy various >protocols\encryptions were to crack. Many of them were completely >trivial. > > > > >----- >Mike Hammett >Intelligent Computing Solutions >http://www.ics-il.com > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:12:42 AM >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> > > >What you do is pretty ir relevant. I don't know if you've been paying >attention lately, but... > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/12/04/1823255/how-the-nsa-is-spying-on-everyone-more-revelations > >http://politics.slashdot.org/story/15/01/18/202220/nsa-prepares-for-future-techno-battles-by-plotting-network-takedowns > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/12/26/1442220/nsa-reveals-more-than-a-decade-of-improper-surveillance > >http://it.slashdot.org/story/15/01/14/2036249/nsa-official-supporting-backdoored-random-number-generat > >http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/12/30/2235230/nsa-says-they-have-vpns-in-a-vulcan-death-grip > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/12/28/2054228/snowden-documents-show-how-well-nsa-codebreakers-can-pry > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/01/18/0215255/feds-operated-yet-another-secret-metadata-database-until-2013 > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/08/25/2227226/850-billion-nsa-surveillance-records-searchable-by-domestic-law-enforcement > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/02/04/0026258/dea-presentation-shows-how-agency-hides-investigative-methods-from-trial-review > >http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/08/05/168205/dea-program-more-troubling-than-nsa > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/10/31/1814232/federal-judge-approves-warrantless-covert-video-surveillance > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/01/12/1759210/fbi-access-to-nsa-surveillance-data-expands-in-recent-years > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/01/20/1540241/fbi-seeks-to-legally-hack-you-if-youre-connected-to-tor-or-a-vpn > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/01/06/1524223/fbi-says-search-warrants-not-needed-to-use-stingrays-in-public-places > >http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/01/17/2156204/obama-govt-shouldnt-be-hampered-by-encrypted-communications > >http://news.slashdot.org/story/14/12/31/2124209/when-fisa-court-rejects-a-surveillance-request-the-fbi-issues-a-nsl-instead > > >These are just the basics. >josh reynolds :: chief information officer >spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 01/20/2015 11:07 PM, CBB - Jay >Fuller wrote: > > >sure they do. but i don't have to make it easy for them :) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Josh Reynolds > To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 1:58 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> > > >*everybody*, from the NSA, FBI, DEA, <insert agency here> knows >everything you do already. > >josh reynolds :: chief information officer >spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.comOn 01/20/2015 10:35 PM, CBB - Jay >Fuller wrote: > >not i. i'm too paranoid google will catalog everything i see and do. >i still enjoy using an old netscape clone (seamoney) although chrome is >loaded for certain tasks. >FYI - seamonkey is 3-5 seconds to load (sitting at "loading dashboard >parms" ) ; followed by a normal login. >no complaints - ok , min complaints. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Josh Luthman > To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:08 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> > > > Everyone uses Chrome nowadays. > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > >On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >Example: Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite >awhile on Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome. > > >On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> >wrote: > >I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one >browser and not on another. What browser is everyone using when they >see lag? What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using? > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good job of merging 2 threads! You win one free Internet! > > From: Chuck McCown > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM > To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> > > Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right? > > From: Sean Heskett > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM > To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> > > less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well. > > > >On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman ><[email protected]> wrote: > >I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem. The >interface takes too long when it first shows up. Maybe it's because it >gets all the information at once, maybe not. Don't care. I want it to >be more smooth and faster. > >My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for Android. >The interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that. > >Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's fine, >but it's just flat out wrong. I don't want to carry a big fat i7 >laptop up the tower when I could just simply use my phone. It works >with Ubiquiti, FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should >only make sense the one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed >instead of changing my devices that work with the competitors products >(as well as different products under their portfolio). > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > >i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the ePMP >page load slowly. > >maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just trying to >bring valid input to the discussion. > >On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman ><[email protected]> wrote: > >Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine? This doesn't >even make sense. There are people with slower laptops that work with >other modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads slow. >There's no point in arguing peoples valid complaints. Are you trying >to direct the engineers attention to something else? > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > >On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then two maybe >three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will work when I'm >RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get home and post >it up on YouTube. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett >Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] >Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> > > >Login takes forever. The first like 10-15 seconds just load and load >and load. Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of page rendering. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > >we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for us. It >was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha. > > not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen it. > > 2 cents > > -sean > > > >On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote: > >Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad. My Field Laptop, a Lenovo S10-3t, >Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB Pages in a >timely manner. We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and 20-30 >seconds per screen refresh/menu change. Since I'm going to have to go >to the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field >troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum system specs >for a machine to view the EPMP Screens? Unless Cambium is going to get >their Web interface under control as of Yesterday. > >They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not >purchased (something I still can't believe). I'd like to know who the >engineers/managers are who signed off on that design. I can only >imaging that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference >table, watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, >all nodding their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful >layout, the field tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for >the pages to load so they can look this pretty!!" > >I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL aspects >of product development out into the field. 40 seconds waiting for the >page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not when >you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing >rain trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't >linking up. I think that every WISP on this list would be more than >happy to host an engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the >parking lot and assemble it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, >they'll get some idea of what we experience. > >I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a week in >the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded instantly on >any device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and unmounted) with >1 gloved hand. > > </rant> > Nate -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
