perhaps powering them up and testing them adds to the price.   either way, 
lessons learned, for us WISPS.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ken Hohhof 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 12:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee


  It would be interesting to know what if any radios go through any functional 
testing before they ship.  Years ago, all electronic devices went through 100% 
testing, I’m guessing today very few are even powered up at the end of the 
production line.  I know I’ve seen a few routerboards with 1 bad Ethernet port 
out of the box, and radios that power up with some kind of warning notice like 
not calibrated.  I do remember a plant tour video from the Orthogon guys on the 
testing, burn-in and calibration they do (or at least did at the time) on every 
PTP radio.  Maybe licensed radios all get tested before shipment, I don’t know. 
 Maybe airFibers.


  From: Josh Luthman 
  Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 12:10 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

  I had a bad SM already.  We believe a defective AP as well.  I have 8 
installed.

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Jan 25, 2015 12:07 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <[email protected]> 
wrote:


    I understand we have had one or two bad radios as well.  Something to look 
out for.  We've only installed a handful of radios

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Craig House 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 12:43 PM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

      Couldn't get it to stay connected long enough to run one tried running a 
speed test a couple of times and it would vary anywhere from two mag to 30 meg 
before it would drop

      Sent from my iPhone

      On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:41, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> 
wrote:


        Did you ever do a link test with epmp?

        Josh Luthman
        Office: 937-552-2340
        Direct: 937-552-2343
        1100 Wayne St
        Suite 1337
        Troy, OH 45373

        On Jan 23, 2015 1:15 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote:

          Ok so I go to the tower today replace the Epmp AP with a  Rocket M2 
on the same antenna (Dual slant) and test with a Nano M2 at the same place I 
tested yesterday.  I get -44 signal 95% Quality and 96% capacity and speedtests 
as pictured.  What is the problem with the EPMP equipment.  So far I am not 
impressed.  IF the EPMP thinks the noise floor is -60 ish and a UBNT has no 
problem getting great thoughput I guess we will stick with the UBNT



----------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
          To: [email protected]
          Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 6:25:52 AM
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee


          Ok  so as an experiment I moved my 2.4 FSK omni to the same channel 
that this EPMP sector was on at the same height on the same tower.  All 41 
customers reconnected to the fsk omni and all link tests are in the upper 95% 
and better on all customers 

          So why would this spectrum be so dirty for the 90 degree EPMP sector 
but usable and great link tests for the FSK omni  at the same height.?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
          To: [email protected]
          Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:24:27 PM
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee


          Cant use 5Ghz  All my BH links are in 5ghz and I cant get though 
trees with 5ghz.  90% of my customer base is behind trees.  This is not the 
tower I plan on leaving it on.  But I dont understand why the noise floor would 
be that high here.  It is 3 miles from any town and sits in the middle of 
nothing.  Cow pastures all around.  Unless the cows are carrying wireless 
routers??



----------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: "John Woodfield" <[email protected]>
          To: [email protected]
          Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:12:39 PM
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee


          I would suggest 5ghz. Thats is stupid high for 2.4...

          John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) 
708-1937




          -----Original Message-----
          From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
          Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 9:07pm
          To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee




          Yes I'm using a 90° sector and that AP is 180 feet up


          Sent from my iPhone

          On Jan 22, 2015, at 19:28, John Woodfield <[email protected]> 
wrote:


            That noise floor is horrible. I usually don't see it that bad even 
at 200' in the air. Are you using a sector?







            John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) 
708-1937




            -----Original Message-----
            From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
            Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:59pm
            To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee




            Yes sorry.  Capacity is bad. Quality is good 


            Sent from my iPhone

            On Jan 22, 2015, at 18:57, Josh Luthman 
<[email protected]> wrote:


              Quality?

              On Jan 22, 2015 7:39 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

                Ok  done.  I have a -56 signal at the SM attached is a 
screenshot of the analysis.  -75 around the channel that I am on with the apj
                So that is not the problem.  Why would I have only 15% to 40% 
uplink capacity when I have 95-100% capacity and a -56 signal

----------------------------------------------------------------

                From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
                To: [email protected]
                Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:20:07 PM
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

                Have Java installed, run that program. Connect to that radio.


                -----
                Mike Hammett
                Intelligent Computing Solutions
                http://www.ics-il.com




----------------------------------------------------------------

                From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
                To: [email protected]
                Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:55:54 PM
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

                So I switch the AP to Spectrum analyzer mode and reboot. Got to 
the spec analyzer tab and click download tool.  How do I use it.  It is a 
separate utility that my laptop doesn't know how to use the file?

----------------------------------------------------------------

                From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
                To: [email protected]
                Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:39:34 PM
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

                Monitor wireless might have a scan what you're after.  I think 
that's only compatible (ie TDD OR wifi not both) networks seen.

                Uplink issue, noise and all that basic rf stuff?

                Josh Luthman
                Office: 937-552-2340
                Direct: 937-552-2343
                1100 Wayne St
                Suite 1337
                Troy, OH 45373

                On Jan 22, 2015 6:07 PM, "Craig House" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

                  I've been using cambium/Motorola FSK products now for 10 
years but the EPMP product has a few things that I can't quite get to work
                  The main one that concerns me is that I'm using an integrated 
SM and at any distance from the tower I can make it connect as long as I know 
the SSID. But what is the trick to making it show available SS IDs to connect 
to sort of like the scan available access points feature in ubiquity?


                  The second question is that even a very close distances and 
was very good signals like -53 I have difficulty getting good uplink capacity 
the quality seems to be reasonable 90% or above but the capacity varies from 
15% to 45% most of the time and it's obvious in the speed test that the uplink 
is not doing what it should
                  What am I doing wrong photo is attached of what I'm talking 
about in the second question



                  Sent from my iPhone


Reply via email to