I understand we have had one or two bad radios as well.  Something to look out 
for.  We've only installed a handful of radios

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Craig House 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 12:43 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee


  Couldn't get it to stay connected long enough to run one tried running a 
speed test a couple of times and it would vary anywhere from two mag to 30 meg 
before it would drop

  Sent from my iPhone

  On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:41, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote:


    Did you ever do a link test with epmp?

    Josh Luthman
    Office: 937-552-2340
    Direct: 937-552-2343
    1100 Wayne St
    Suite 1337
    Troy, OH 45373

    On Jan 23, 2015 1:15 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote:

      Ok so I go to the tower today replace the Epmp AP with a  Rocket M2 on 
the same antenna (Dual slant) and test with a Nano M2 at the same place I 
tested yesterday.  I get -44 signal 95% Quality and 96% capacity and speedtests 
as pictured.  What is the problem with the EPMP equipment.  So far I am not 
impressed.  IF the EPMP thinks the noise floor is -60 ish and a UBNT has no 
problem getting great thoughput I guess we will stick with the UBNT




--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 6:25:52 AM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee



      Ok  so as an experiment I moved my 2.4 FSK omni to the same channel that 
this EPMP sector was on at the same height on the same tower.  All 41 customers 
reconnected to the fsk omni and all link tests are in the upper 95% and better 
on all customers 

      So why would this spectrum be so dirty for the 90 degree EPMP sector but 
usable and great link tests for the FSK omni  at the same height.?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:24:27 PM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee



      Cant use 5Ghz  All my BH links are in 5ghz and I cant get though trees 
with 5ghz.  90% of my customer base is behind trees.  This is not the tower I 
plan on leaving it on.  But I dont understand why the noise floor would be that 
high here.  It is 3 miles from any town and sits in the middle of nothing.  Cow 
pastures all around.  Unless the cows are carrying wireless routers??




--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: "John Woodfield" <[email protected]>
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:12:39 PM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee



      I would suggest 5ghz. Thats is stupid high for 2.4...

      John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) 
708-1937






      -----Original Message-----
      From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
      Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 9:07pm
      To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee






      Yes I'm using a 90° sector and that AP is 180 feet up



      Sent from my iPhone

      On Jan 22, 2015, at 19:28, John Woodfield <[email protected]> wrote:



        That noise floor is horrible. I usually don't see it that bad even at 
200' in the air. Are you using a sector?







        John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) 
708-1937






        -----Original Message-----
        From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
        Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:59pm
        To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee






        Yes sorry.  Capacity is bad. Quality is good 



        Sent from my iPhone

        On Jan 22, 2015, at 18:57, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> 
wrote:



          Quality?

          On Jan 22, 2015 7:39 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

            Ok  done.  I have a -56 signal at the SM attached is a screenshot 
of the analysis.  -75 around the channel that I am on with the apj
            So that is not the problem.  Why would I have only 15% to 40% 
uplink capacity when I have 95-100% capacity and a -56 signal

--------------------------------------------------------------------

            From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
            To: [email protected]
            Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:20:07 PM
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

            Have Java installed, run that program. Connect to that radio.


            -----
            Mike Hammett
            Intelligent Computing Solutions
            http://www.ics-il.com





--------------------------------------------------------------------

            From: "Craig House" <[email protected]>
            To: [email protected]
            Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:55:54 PM
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

            So I switch the AP to Spectrum analyzer mode and reboot. Got to the 
spec analyzer tab and click download tool.  How do I use it.  It is a separate 
utility that my laptop doesn't know how to use the file?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

            From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
            To: [email protected]
            Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:39:34 PM
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp newbee

            Monitor wireless might have a scan what you're after.  I think 
that's only compatible (ie TDD OR wifi not both) networks seen.

            Uplink issue, noise and all that basic rf stuff?

            Josh Luthman
            Office: 937-552-2340
            Direct: 937-552-2343
            1100 Wayne St
            Suite 1337
            Troy, OH 45373

            On Jan 22, 2015 6:07 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> 
wrote:

              I've been using cambium/Motorola FSK products now for 10 years 
but the EPMP product has a few things that I can't quite get to work
              The main one that concerns me is that I'm using an integrated SM 
and at any distance from the tower I can make it connect as long as I know the 
SSID. But what is the trick to making it show available SS IDs to connect to 
sort of like the scan available access points feature in ubiquity?



              The second question is that even a very close distances and was 
very good signals like -53 I have difficulty getting good uplink capacity the 
quality seems to be reasonable 90% or above but the capacity varies from 15% to 
45% most of the time and it's obvious in the speed test that the uplink is not 
doing what it should
              What am I doing wrong photo is attached of what I'm talking about 
in the second question




              Sent from my iPhone





Reply via email to