I'll weigh in on this too. It would be a great option for us at some sights 
also. I would deploy at towers that would have waited for upgrades and deploy 
at a faster rate. We would still use some epmp though as we are already 
deploying it at sites.  

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Craig Schmaderer <[email protected]> wrote:

>I would love this.  Now I can spend half as much on a 4 sector tower that will 
>only need to serve 40 customers.  I have a lot of towers like this and I hated 
>to spend 12 grand so I just used an omni.  And I hated doing that.  
>
>
>
>On Feb 5, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>They did that with 100 series, I still have one of those APs out there.
>
> 
>
>I have a fair number of 450 APs with less than 10 SMs.  They probably will 
>eventually have more.  But in the meantime, I could be spending that money on 
>SMs.  And then a license upgrade later.  It is a zero sum game, we only have 
>so much money.  If we spend it on stuff that brings in more money, now we have 
>more money to spend.
>
> 
>
> 
>
>From: Kurt Fankhauser 
>
>Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 7:46 PM
>
>To: [email protected] 
>
>Subject: [AFMUG] AF rumored 450 ap lite...
>
> 
>
>Talking at the cambium booth today they are seriously considering a lite 450 
>ap in all frequency bands with existing hardware and a 10 user cap. Price 
>would be half what full ap is with license key upgrade availiable to get full 
>capacity at price difference from what full ap would have been to begin in the 
>first place. I asked them when and they said by end of this quarter...
>
>Sent from my iPad 
>
> 
>
>Kurt Fankhauser
>
>Wavelinc Communications
>
>P.O. Box 126
>
>Bucyrus, OH 44820
>
>http://www.wavelinc.com
>
>tel. 419-562-6405
>
>fax. 419-617-0110
>

Reply via email to