Surely Ubnt and Cambium, among many others, saw that as a possible usable band before it was actually legal to operate in. They have two AF5 units already - an upper band for other countries I assume and a mid range one that doesn't seem to be any different in the US (unless your DFS shots are super close).
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > It was in development before that was opened up... required a hardware > change. > > I would suspect we would see something soon. There's also been talk of > getting 4.9 cert on the AF5 and an AFX type product, but I don't know > what's come of that yet. > > Josh Reynolds > CIO, [email protected] > > On 2/9/2015 10:54 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Why not try the 5.1 band? Oh wait...this brand new $2k product can't do > the best part of the 5 GHz band... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Ty Featherling <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yeah our 14 mile link was almost too crowded in 5.7 and DFS was way under >> power. We eeked by though with 200FDX. I'm thinking of swapping that link >> out for an Airfiber X5 link. I need to run the numbers to see what I could >> get there first though. >> >> -Ty >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jerry Richardson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> 11.2 miles >>> >>> 160ASL – 3450ASL >>> >>> 5.7 too crowded >>> >>> DFS under power >>> >>> >>> >>> Not usable for this application. Looking forward to testing it for a >>> shorter link in a less congested area. >>> >>> >>> >>> We should have been on a licensed link a long time ago… At least we are >>> going that way now. >>> >> >> > >
