No match for what I am bringing ;) On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Ben Moore" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, February 9, 2015 5:28:28 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] First attempt with AF5 a bust > > I got spikes ;) > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Give Ben a couple weeks and I bet he'll be doing some kicking in St. >> Louis. I need to wear shin guards while I'm there. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Ben Moore" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Monday, February 9, 2015 5:26:35 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] First attempt with AF5 a bust >> >> >> Alive and kicking ;) Yes, this product was too far along in the >> process. With the AF-5X release, this will cover the 5.1-5.8GHz band. >> Knowing when any band will become available is always a challenge...(and >> 5.1GHz is not used in many, many parts of the world). >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't know how long the products were in development before the >>> proposal to open the lower band was finalized. Maybe UBNT will comment on >>> this? >>> >>> Ben? You alive? >>> >>> Josh Reynolds >>> CIO, [email protected] >>> >>> On 2/9/2015 11:02 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> Surely Ubnt and Cambium, among many others, saw that as a possible >>> usable band before it was actually legal to operate in. They have two AF5 >>> units already - an upper band for other countries I assume and a mid range >>> one that doesn't seem to be any different in the US (unless your DFS shots >>> are super close). >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It was in development before that was opened up... required a >>>> hardware change. >>>> >>>> I would suspect we would see something soon. There's also been talk of >>>> getting 4.9 cert on the AF5 and an AFX type product, but I don't know >>>> what's come of that yet. >>>> >>>> Josh Reynolds >>>> CIO, [email protected] >>>> >>>> On 2/9/2015 10:54 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> Why not try the 5.1 band? Oh wait...this brand new $2k product can't >>>> do the best part of the 5 GHz band... >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Ty Featherling < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah our 14 mile link was almost too crowded in 5.7 and DFS was way >>>>> under power. We eeked by though with 200FDX. I'm thinking of swapping that >>>>> link out for an Airfiber X5 link. I need to run the numbers to see what I >>>>> could get there first though. >>>>> >>>>> -Ty >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jerry Richardson <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 11.2 miles >>>>>> >>>>>> 160ASL – 3450ASL >>>>>> >>>>>> 5.7 too crowded >>>>>> >>>>>> DFS under power >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not usable for this application. Looking forward to testing it for a >>>>>> shorter link in a less congested area. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We should have been on a licensed link a long time ago… At least we >>>>>> are going that way now. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
