Increased sectors, increased smart antennas, increased sync. We all need to graduate.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:03:56 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. Agreed but now there could be less room for additional development of other wireless devices. Also, if they would stay on on side of the band would be nice like 5.1 Still plenty of room for us. On 03/03/2015 06:31 AM, Patrick Leary wrote: That's called "malicious interference" and can and should get you fined and shut down. Further, it is not WISP spectrum and never was. I have never understood the WISP sense of entitlement with unlicensed (free) spectrum, especially given that it is a population that is largely politically conservative. On Mar 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul stuff at there towers and make there signal about worthless? If so that would teach cell phone companies not to mess with WISP’s spectrum. From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. If systems like this end up rolling out on cell sites across the nation we are going to see some tough times getting clear channels. I’ve seen several proposals now for tower based systems that use very large swaths of 5Ghz as alternative LTE data paths to cell phones with multi-channel BW designed to suck up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found. http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/ Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 [email protected] </blockquote>
