I refuse to use any CMS system of any kind because they're easily exploited.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 11:17:27 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. Interesting, We use drupal for this site so its possible not sure how it happened because its sits on a Lamp stack server. Thanks Dave On 03/03/2015 10:46 AM, Patrick Leary wrote: FYI David Inline image 1 On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Yes, I love my 3.65 deployment thus far and not looking back. Steadily moving with more tower growth and more deployments. We have 4 sites scheduled this year to go on and 1 is completed working 2 this next quarter. We are doing a full 3.65 on each site and adding 5Ghz 450 where it makes sense. On 03/03/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Leary wrote: <blockquote> We love 5.15-5.25 though. So far our customer testing is showing performance very close to our 3.65 due to the low noise floor, and I know you've been reading about how the 3.65 is doing. Patrick Telrad On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:03 AM, David < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Agreed but now there could be less room for additional development of other wireless devices. Also, if they would stay on on side of the band would be nice like 5.1 Still plenty of room for us. On 03/03/2015 06:31 AM, Patrick Leary wrote: <blockquote> That's called "malicious interference" and can and should get you fined and shut down. Further, it is not WISP spectrum and never was. I have never understood the WISP sense of entitlement with unlicensed (free) spectrum, especially given that it is a population that is largely politically conservative. On Mar 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul stuff at there towers and make there signal about worthless? If so that would teach cell phone companies not to mess with WISP’s spectrum. From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. If systems like this end up rolling out on cell sites across the nation we are going to see some tough times getting clear channels. I’ve seen several proposals now for tower based systems that use very large swaths of 5Ghz as alternative LTE data paths to cell phones with multi-channel BW designed to suck up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found. http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/ Peter Kranz Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 [email protected] </blockquote> </blockquote> -- Patrick Leary Director BD, North America, Telrad 727.501.3735 [email protected] [this address is only for AFMUG] p [email protected] [this is my corporate address] </blockquote> </blockquote> -- Patrick Leary Director BD, North America, Telrad 727.501.3735 [email protected] [this address is only for AFMUG] p [email protected] [this is my corporate address] </blockquote>
