I'm guessing they're using the normal LTE stuff for the uplink... it makes sense, really.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:39 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> wrote: > > how does that work - isn't internet a two-way communication? > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mike Hammett <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 11:17 AM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > Nope. The towers only broadcast. They are not two-way. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, March 2, 2015 11:16:14 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul stuff at there towers and make > there signal about worthless? If so that would teach cell phone companies > not to mess with WISP’s spectrum. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz > *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > > > If systems like this end up rolling out on cell sites across the nation we > are going to see some tough times getting clear channels. I’ve seen several > proposals now for tower based systems that use very large swaths of 5Ghz as > alternative LTE data paths to cell phones with multi-channel BW designed to > suck up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found. > > > > http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/ > > > > > *Peter Kranz*Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd > www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > [email protected] > > > >
