I did a full scan today with my Kaspersky. Seems I'm okay, but I don't know 
s**t about that stuff.

Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:[email protected]]<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>





From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..

Patrick,
 This maybe something you may need to look at on your system.
http://blog.vilmatech.com/remove-heurtrojan-script-generic-redirected-flash-player-page/
From what I read this is a trojan on the client not server.

thanks
Dave
On 03/03/2015 10:46 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
FYI David
[Inline image 1]

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes,
I love my 3.65 deployment thus far and not looking back. Steadily moving with 
more tower growth and more deployments.
We have 4 sites scheduled this year to go on and 1 is completed working 2 this 
next quarter.
We are doing a full 3.65 on each site and adding 5Ghz 450 where it makes sense.
On 03/03/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
We love 5.15-5.25 though. So far our customer testing is showing performance 
very close to our 3.65 due to the low noise floor, and I know you've been 
reading about how the 3.65 is doing.

Patrick
Telrad

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:03 AM, David 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Agreed but now there could be less room for additional development of other 
wireless devices.
 Also, if they would stay on on side of the band would be nice like 5.1
Still plenty of room for us.

On 03/03/2015 06:31 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:

That's called "malicious interference" and can and should get you fined and 
shut down. Further, it is not WISP spectrum and never was. I have never 
understood the WISP sense of entitlement with unlicensed (free) spectrum, 
especially given that it is a population that is largely politically 
conservative.
On Mar 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Tim Reichhart" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul stuff at there towers and make there 
signal about worthless? If so that would teach cell phone companies not to mess 
with WISP’s spectrum.


From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of Peter Kranz
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..



If systems like this end up rolling out on cell sites across the nation we are 
going to see some tough times getting clear channels. I’ve seen several 
proposals now for tower based systems that use very large swaths of 5Ghz as 
alternative LTE data paths to cell phones with multi-channel BW designed to 
suck up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found.



http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/



Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com<http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100<tel:510-868-1614%20x100>
Mobile: 510-207-0000<tel:510-207-0000>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>






--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735<tel:727.501.3735>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [this address 
is only for AFMUG]
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [this is my corporate 
address]




--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [this address 
is only for AFMUG]
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [this is my corporate 
address]





************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************

Reply via email to