I use FF extensively ran into some issues with chrome on win7/8
Plus FF is also used on all of my ubuntu and lubuntu systems
On 3/3/2015 12:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Use Chrome?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Patrick Leary
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I did a full scan today with my Kaspersky. Seems I'm okay, but I
don't know s**t about that stuff.
*Patrick Leary*
***M*727.501.3735 <tel:727.501.3735>
<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *David
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:48 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..
Patrick,
This maybe something you may need to look at on your system.
http://blog.vilmatech.com/remove-heurtrojan-script-generic-redirected-flash-player-page/
From what I read this is a trojan on the client not server.
thanks
Dave
On 03/03/2015 10:46 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
FYI David
Inline image 1
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes,
I love my 3.65 deployment thus far and not looking back.
Steadily moving with more tower growth and more deployments.
We have 4 sites scheduled this year to go on and 1 is
completed working 2 this next quarter.
We are doing a full 3.65 on each site and adding 5Ghz 450
where it makes sense.
On 03/03/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
We love 5.15-5.25 though. So far our customer testing is
showing performance very close to our 3.65 due to the low
noise floor, and I know you've been reading about how the
3.65 is doing.
Patrick
Telrad
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:03 AM, David
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Agreed but now there could be less room for additional
development of other wireless devices.
Also, if they would stay on on side of the band would
be nice like 5.1
Still plenty of room for us.
On 03/03/2015 06:31 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
That's called "malicious interference" and can and
should get you fined and shut down. Further, it is
not WISP spectrum and never was. I have never
understood the WISP sense of entitlement with
unlicensed (free) spectrum, especially given that
it is a population that is largely politically
conservative.
On Mar 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Tim Reichhart"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul
stuff at there towers and make there signal
about worthless? If so that would teach cell
phone companies not to mess with WISP’s spectrum.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of
*Peter Kranz
*Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the
commons on 5 GHz..
If systems like this end up rolling out on
cell sites across the nation we are going to
see some tough times getting clear channels.
I’ve seen several proposals now for tower
based systems that use very large swaths of
5Ghz as alternative LTE data paths to cell
phones with multi-channel BW designed to suck
up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/
*Peter Kranz
*Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <tel:510-868-1614%20x100>
Mobile: 510-207-0000 <tel:510-207-0000>
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735 <tel:727.501.3735>
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [this address is
only for AFMUG]
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [this is my corporate
address]
--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735 <tel:727.501.3735>
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [this address is only
for AFMUG]
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [this is my corporate address]
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
--
