yes, but what are your link tests on canopy 900?  Sure it'll hold a link but if 
you're only moving "serial data", it can have uplink percentage of 8% and still 
get the data through... :)

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jaime Solorza 
  To: Animal Farm 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:36 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..


  I have yet to see a good FHSS radio get knocked off the air be it serial or 
Ethernet.  I can only speak about GE MDS, Freewave, MaXstream MicroHard and 
CalAMP.  Canopy 900MHz is still working in many areas of town even near 
refinery and water companies MAS farm.   TxDOT using MDS and Encom for 
ITS....all in the 902-928MHz band with EPEC deploying Itron and Neptune smart 
meters......
  It does take work but so far ..knock on wood


  Jaime Solorza
  Wireless Systems Architect
  915-861-1390


  On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote:

    Yeah, stop being cry babies and man up! 

    Gino A. Villarini 
    @gvillarini





    On Mar 3, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:


      Here in the border we have to deal with interference on licensed and 
unlicensed bands from another country!   Even our Public Safety system was 
interfered with and had to be dealt with.  Like Gino says, Its part of doing 
business in these bands!   


      Jaime Solorza 
      Wireless Systems Architect
      915-861-1390


      On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Jerry Richardson <je...@richardson.bz> 
wrote:

        Yep, lived it.



        The discussions PG&E ended with “Our lawyers say we are in compliance, 
take it up with them”.



        OK then….



        We managed to keep some links up, but ultimately it relegated 900 to 
very low density neighborhoods and links that needed to be -65 or better at 
both ends. 







        From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz
        Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:02 AM
        To: af@afmug.com
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz..



        I think the point some are missing is the lesson learned from 900Mhz 
and smart meters. 



        While 900Mhz is unlicensed spectrum, a single operator has managed to 
take it over in California to the point where no other user has any chance of 
using the spectrum for commercial purposes.



        By this I mean that PG&E’s deployment of smart meters on every power 
meter in the area, and on top of power poles, and other high sites, has raised 
the noise floor on this band to unusable levels for high speed communications.



        So by means of overwhelming numbers, PG&E managed to take over 900Mhz 
for its own users, stranding the investment of ISPs in this spectrum in 
affected markets. I don’t think the commissions initial concept of unlicensed 
spectrum was that a single operator would do this, I think they expected 
operators by this to use licensed spectrum.



        I’d like to see a limit on how many systems a particular entity can 
deploy in an unlicensed band. It could be some high number, like 1 million 
units.



        Peter Kranz
        Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
        www.UnwiredLtd.com
        Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
        Mobile: 510-207-0000
        pkr...@unwiredltd.com




Reply via email to