Yes, he did... I'm worried :P I think I'll start polishing my pitchfork... just in case.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers????????????? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: > >> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >>> >>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys actual >>> hands yet is it? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >>>> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >>>> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it needs >>>>> done in the next couple weeks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have airprism. >>>>>> The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in >>>>>> airprism between the two which means they will always be limited to ptp >>>>>> or >>>>>> ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent separation. >>>>>> >>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >>>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this >>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>> >>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this >>>>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should >>>>>> perform >>>>>> best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this >>>>>> point. >>>>>> I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>>>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>> parabolics. I >>>>>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats >>>>>>> what >>>>>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >>>>>>> two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >
