AHEM!!!!!!!!!!
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: > No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >> >> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys actual >> hands yet is it? >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >>> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all >>> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it needs >>>> done in the next couple weeks. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>> >>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have airprism. >>>>> The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences in >>>>> airprism between the two which means they will always be limited to ptp or >>>>> ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent separation. >>>>> >>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this >>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>> >>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this >>>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should perform >>>>> best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this >>>>> point. >>>>> I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>> >>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>>> >>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>> >>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>> parabolics. I >>>>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats what >>>>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >>>>>> two things that are going to converge? >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>> >>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>> products there? >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > >
