You didn't really think that number would be accurate, did you?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> Well you can wait 2 weeks but after being told 10 days I expected 10 days.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So if we don't have them in two weeks we can get out our torches and
>> pitchforks?
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized
>>>>
>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys actual
>>>> hands yet is it?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link?
>>>>> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go all
>>>>> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it
>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have
>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently
>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will always be
>>>>>>> limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent
>>>>>>> separation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are
>>>>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy
>>>>>>> features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this
>>>>>>> point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this
>>>>>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should 
>>>>>>> perform
>>>>>>> best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at this 
>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>> I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
>>>>>>>> connectorized units?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP
>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont
>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is
>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of
>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
>>>>>>>> products there?
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to