Can't do multipoint "yet". Yet is the key word :) On March 21, 2015 7:18:33 AM AKDT, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >RIght, airfiber can't do multipoint... so that would obviously be a >reason >to use AC. > >On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:12 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller ><par...@cyberbroadband.net >> wrote: > >> >> af won't do multipoint, right? >> :) >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> *To:* af <af@afmug.com> >> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:24 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >> >> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the link? >> Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well go >all >> the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman ><j...@imaginenetworksllc.com >> > wrote: >> >>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >needs >>> done in the next couple weeks. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard ><mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>> >>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >airprism. >>>> The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently differences >in >>>> airprism between the two which means they will always be limited to >ptp or >>>> ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a permanent separation. >>>> >>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they are >going >>>> to perform better than the old junk, they also have some spiffy >features >>>> like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC line at this >point is the >>>> lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>> >>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at this >>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC should >perform >>>> best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more flexibility at >this point. >>>> I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in every way. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy ><thatoneguyst...@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>> connectorized units? >>>>> >>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >only? >>>>> >>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>> >>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >already >>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >parabolics. I >>>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know >whats what >>>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or >is this >>>>> two things that are going to converge? >>>>> >>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >there >>>>> any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >performance? >>>>> (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>> >>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>> products there? >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
