Assuming no two APs are bridged, yup!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:

> Client isolation on the AP with the AP in router mode fixes that
>
> On March 24, 2015 12:33:50 PM AKDT, Josh Luthman <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Oh the Airrouter.  Are you not scared that customers will plug in their
>> device backwards?  Or are you doing a firewall on every Ubnt SM to block
>> responses?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  If I move it to the LAN port, I have to NAT the outdoor radio.  Then I
>>> can’t manage it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2015 1:16 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirRouter failures
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> AirControl can't manage it???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pick up the router.  See the cables?  Yes, move that one over from WAN
>>> to 1.  That should be pretty easy.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But ya, I can see not wanting to do different stuff for 1 customer here
>>> or there.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The problem is then AirControl can’t manage it and the customer is going
>>> to take an hour to walk him through moving the cables.  Easier just to
>>> drive there plus we have some other stuff to do down there.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2015 1:10 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirRouter failures
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If it's a Ubnt device plugged into it, NAT the SM and have the customer
>>> move the cable over to lan1.  Then turn off DHCP on the Airrouter.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> And as this thread starts, another AirRouter bites the dust 60 miles
>>> from my closest tech.  We can tell because the outdoor radio reports the
>>> port at 10Mbps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:23 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirRouter failures
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We started with the AirGateway but the range wasn’t there.  We use the
>>> LR’s now.  In some cases, we put a bigger antenna on them that gives
>>> another 2dB but depending on where we have to install, we sometimes run 2
>>> of them or start with AirRouter-HPs and bigger antennas.  When we do that
>>> the customer has to live with WPA security.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2015 8:55 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirRouter failures
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you using regular AG or the AG-LR?  Even though the AG/AR have the
>>> exact same antenna, I'm concerned about it's placement destroying its
>>> coverage in homes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I like the AG-LR's mounting bracket almost as much as the external
>>> antenna.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So far the AirGateways seem to be doing better than the AirRouters but
>>> they are newer.  We stopped using AirRouters and went to AirGateways for
>>> that reason.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2015 8:48 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AirRouter failures
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I never deployed many, but I have seen most of them need to have the
>>> firmware TFTPed back on. THey're doing better, though than the airGateways.
>>> I deployed one and within a week that one failed. *shrugs*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *"Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]>
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:37:19 AM
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] AirRouter failures
>>>
>>> Has anyone else seen a high failure rate for Ubnt AirRouters they bought
>>> in the last 12 months? Been having to replace a lot of them and putting in
>>> Mikrotik RB-951's
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kurt Fankhauser
>>>
>>> Wavelinc Communications
>>>
>>> P.O. Box 126
>>>
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>>>
>>> http://www.wavelinc.com
>>>
>>> tel. 419-562-6405
>>>
>>> fax. 419-617-0110
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>

Reply via email to