Yes On March 25, 2015 8:27:55 AM AKDT, Randy Cosby <[email protected]> wrote: >I'm curious about the low power draw. Does the 5X keep a constant data > >stream going like the AF24? > >On 3/25/2015 10:25 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >> Excellent! 28 VDC should be high enough to run directly off batteries > >> without letting any smoke out. >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Chuck Macenski <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We support between 20 - 28 VDC with a power draw of 15W. >> >> Chuck >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Jeremy <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> According to this post in UBNT Air Fiber stories, the AF5X >> uses 9.5W at 24V. >> >https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber-Stories/AF5X-on-14-1-mile-link-420Mbps-Capacity/cns-p/1198949 >> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Jeremy >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >wrote: >> >> We just install a RSD-300B-24 on all of our sites and >then >> feed that into the fuse block. They are like a hundred >> bucks. I don't like feeding 28.3v into anything 24v. >> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Bill Prince >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> It would be nice to know if it could handle 25, 26, >> 27, 28, or 29 volts. >> >> A lot of us have solar and/or DC plant installations >> that use unregulated 24 volts. So bulk charging could >> be up around 28+ volts. In the past, we've resorted >to >> installing a DC-DC converter to ensure that >> "sensitive" equipment does not let the smoke out >(UBNT >> is on my shit list as being "mostly" sensitive). >> >> I like keeping my POPs simple, but I also do not like >> to let the smoke out. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> On 3/22/2015 11:53 AM, Chuck Macenski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I do not know the voltage spec off the top of my >>> head; we really only support the included 24V PoE. I >>> do know that 48V is too high and will not work. At >>> 24V, I believe the power draw is under 15 Watts; >that >>> consumption goes up if the supplied voltage drops >>> significantly below 24V. >>> >>> Chuck >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ken Hohhof >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Well, it’s a fairly straightforward question. >>> Whereas they could feel the Tx and Rx specs >>> depend on a lot of factors, making the question >>> complicated to answer. >>> So let’s try. >>> Chuck, Ben, or whoever from the airFiber team at >>> Ubiquiti reads this list. Pretty please, could >>> you tell us the min/max POE voltage for the >>> airFiber 5X? >>> If nothing else, those of us who are OK with 24V >>> nominal probably would like to know if 30V would >>> let the magic smoke out, since we have DC sites >>> where the radios run off batteries. >>> *From:* Mike Hammett <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:28 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>> They won't even tell you the Tx power or RX >>> sensitivity, so voltage range I'm sure is out of >>> the question. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ><https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:25:16 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>> >>> Mike, have you asked them for a voltage spec? If >>> it turned out to accept 20-60V you’d probably >>> change your mind and say that is brilliant. >>> *From:* Jeremy <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:05 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>> 24v works way better for me. All my sites are >>> 24v. I have to upconvert to 48v when needed. >>> There is no easy fix because I cannot fit two >>> more batteries in my cabinet, and it would be a >>> total rework even if I could. So it was me and >>> the ten or so that I'll buy. Thanks UBNT! >>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Mike Hammett >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >wrote: >>> >>> Everything UBNT has says carrier. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ><https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:57:46 AM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt >line >>> >>> Or, ya know, somebody might have asked for >>> it, and wanted to buy a million units, and >>> already had 24V at their remote small cell >>> cabinets, or something like that. The >>> description does say carrier backhaul radio, >>> maybe that’s a hint. >>> WISPs in the US are one market for Ubiquiti, >>> not the only market. It’s possible this >>> decision makes great sense and the reason >>> isn’t apparent from our/your perspective. >>> *From:* Mike Hammett ><mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:03 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt >line >>> 24v... because UBNT must do something to >fuck >>> up a product. Just use 48v on everything! >>> First three products use essentially 48v... >>> . than let's do a 24... because! >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ><https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Bill Prince" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:18:57 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt >line >>> >>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power >>> consumption value. The data sheet is no >help >>> except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a >POE >>> injector. That implies a maximum of 24 >>> watts. So less than 24 watts. Anyone have >>> one installed that has measured actual power >>> consumption? If they're running the POE at >>> 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 >>> watts. >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>> >>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted >>> it here and ok the UBNT list awhile back >>> but no one seemed to notice. I intend to >>> keep adding to it based on input from >the >>> community. >>> >>> -Ty >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hot damn! Who made that?!? >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling >>> wrote: >>> >>> Oops let's try again. How about >>> this chart... >>> >>> ubnt radio comparison >>> ><https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk> >>> >>> -Ty >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty >>> Featherling" >>> <[email protected] >>> ><mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Try this chart. >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, >"Ken >>> Hohhof" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >wrote: >>> >>> Yes, charts are always >>> good. Especially if the >>> chart would also have >>> checkmarks for which >>> U-NII bands they are >>> currently approved for. >>> And what power they >take. >>> *From:* Ben Moore >>> ><mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, March >20, >>> 2015 5:51 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] >>> splain the AC ubnt line >>> Yes, we do have too many >>> variants. It is being >>> streamlined in the AC >>> line with NanoBeam, >>> Powerbeam (still will >>> have multiple sizes). >>> NanoBeam = all >integrated >>> PowerBeam = inner >>> feed/dish design >>> It is a challenge with >>> sku's since may sku's >are >>> needed for different >>> areas of the world (i.e. >>> some products are very >>> popular here and not as >>> popular in other parts >of >>> the world). >>> Would chart help? >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at >>> 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof >>> <[email protected] >>> ><mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Ben, you guys have >>> too many product >>> variants, and in >some >>> cases need better >>> naming. Like >>> NanoBridge, >NanoBeam, >>> PowerBeam, NanoBeam >>> AC, PowerBeam AC. I >>> honestly don’t >>> understand the >>> difference between a >>> NanoBeam and a >>> PowerBeam, or why >one >>> has models by >antenna >>> gain in dB and the >>> other by antenna >size >>> in mm. >>> And of course the >>> NanoStation Loco, >why >>> is it Loco? Because >>> it’s crazy small? >>> Then there’s the M >vs >>> W thing. >>> My head hurts. >>> *From:* Ben Moore >>> ><mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> *Sent:* Friday, >March >>> 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> ><mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: >>> [AFMUG] splain the >AC >>> ubnt line >>> Here you go: >>> Lite - No airPrism, >>> will do PTP and PTMP >>> PTP - PTP only, >airPrism >>> PTMP - PTMP only, >>> airPrism >>> These are split due >>> to the filtering >used >>> for each (maximize >>> PTP and PTMP >>> performance). We >>> won't split unless >>> there is a >>> performance reason >>> to. The cost is same >>> either way... >>> How much is the >>> budget? Consider >AF-5X? >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 >>> at 3:02 PM, That One >>> Guy >>> ><[email protected] >>> ><mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The current >>> iteractions of >>> the rocket AC >>> line, these are >>> the only >>> connectorized >units? >>> What are the >>> differences >>> between lite, >>> ptp, and ptmp >>> airprism only? >>> Are some of >these >>> shipping without >>> all there guts? >>> I am looking at >>> replacing an old >>> shitbucket >>> tranzeo link, we >>> already have it >>> connected to one >>> pol of a set of >>> radiowaves 2 >foot >>> HP parabolics. I >>> figure its worth >>> checking out >>> these AC radios, >>> but I dont know >>> whats what now, >>> is this a >>> permanent >>> separation with >>> UBNT of ptp and >>> ptmp or is this >>> two things that >>> are going to >>> converge? >>> Other than the >Ac >>> component, for a >>> low throughput >>> demand link is >>> there any major >>> benefit of going >>> to the AC over >>> the M5 in terms >>> of performance? >>> (future demand >is >>> a factor as >well) >>> Also considering >>> the epmp, goods, >>> bads uglies >>> between the >three >>> products there? >>> -- >>> If you only see >>> yourself as part >>> of the team but >>> you don't see >>> your team as >part >>> of yourself you >>> have already >>> failed as part >of >>> the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
