It would be nice to know if it could handle 25, 26, 27, 28, or 29 volts.

A lot of us have solar and/or DC plant installations that use unregulated 24 volts. So bulk charging could be up around 28+ volts. In the past, we've resorted to installing a DC-DC converter to ensure that "sensitive" equipment does not let the smoke out (UBNT is on my shit list as being "mostly" sensitive).

I like keeping my POPs simple, but I also do not like to let the smoke out.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/22/2015 11:53 AM, Chuck Macenski wrote:
Hi,

I do not know the voltage spec off the top of my head; we really only support the included 24V PoE. I do know that 48V is too high and will not work. At 24V, I believe the power draw is under 15 Watts; that consumption goes up if the supplied voltage drops significantly below 24V.

Chuck

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Well, it’s a fairly straightforward question. Whereas they could
    feel the Tx and Rx specs depend on a lot of factors, making the
    question complicated to answer.
    So let’s try.
    Chuck, Ben, or whoever from the airFiber team at Ubiquiti reads
    this list.  Pretty please, could you tell us the min/max POE
    voltage for the airFiber 5X?
    If nothing else, those of us who are OK with 24V nominal probably
    would like to know if 30V would let the magic smoke out, since we
    have DC sites where the radios run off batteries.
    *From:* Mike Hammett <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:28 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
    They won't even tell you the Tx power or RX sensitivity, so
    voltage range I'm sure is out of the question.



    -----
    Mike Hammett
    Intelligent Computing Solutions
    http://www.ics-il.com

    
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:25:16 AM
    *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line

    Mike, have you asked them for a voltage spec?  If it turned out to
    accept 20-60V you’d probably change your mind and say that is
    brilliant.
    *From:* Jeremy <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:05 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
    24v works way better for me.  All my sites are 24v.  I have to
    upconvert to 48v when needed.  There is no easy fix because I
    cannot fit two more batteries in my cabinet, and it would be a
    total rework even if I could.  So it was me and the ten or so that
    I'll buy.  Thanks UBNT!
    On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Everything UBNT has says carrier.



        -----
        Mike Hammett
        Intelligent Computing Solutions
        http://www.ics-il.com

        
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:57:46 AM

        *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line

        Or, ya know, somebody might have asked for it, and wanted to
        buy a million units, and already had 24V at their remote small
        cell cabinets, or something like that.  The description does
        say carrier backhaul radio, maybe that’s a hint.
        WISPs in the US are one market for Ubiquiti, not the only
        market.  It’s possible this decision makes great sense and the
        reason isn’t apparent from our/your perspective.
        *From:* Mike Hammett <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:03 AM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
        24v... because UBNT must do something to fuck up a product.
        Just use 48v on everything! First three products use
        essentially 48v... .  than let's do a 24...  because!



        -----
        Mike Hammett
        Intelligent Computing Solutions
        http://www.ics-il.com

        
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From: *"Bill Prince" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent: *Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:18:57 AM
        *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line

        I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption
        value.  The data sheet is no help except that it says the
        thing uses 24V 1a POE injector.  That implies a maximum of 24
        watts.  So less than 24 watts. Anyone have one installed that
        has measured actual power consumption?  If they're running the
        POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 watts.

        bp
        <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

        On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:

            I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the
            UBNT list awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I
            intend to keep adding to it based on input from the
            community.

            -Ty

            On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince"
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Hot damn!  Who made that?!?

                bp
                <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote:

                    Oops let's try again. How about this chart...

                    ubnt radio comparison
                    
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>

                    -Ty

                    On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling"
                    <[email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                        Try this chart.

                        On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof"
                        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                            Yes, charts are always good. Especially if
                            the chart would also have checkmarks for
                            which U-NII bands they are currently
                            approved for. And what power they take.
                            *From:* Ben Moore <mailto:[email protected]>
                            *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
                            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
                            Yes, we do have too many variants.  It is
                            being streamlined in the AC line with
                            NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have
                            multiple sizes).
                            NanoBeam = all integrated
                            PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
                            It is a challenge with sku's since may
                            sku's are needed for different areas of
                            the world (i.e. some products are very
                            popular here and not as popular in other
                            parts of the world).
                            Would chart help?
                            On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken
                            Hohhof <[email protected]
                            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                                Ben, you guys have too many product
                                variants, and in some cases need
                                better naming.  Like NanoBridge,
                                NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC,
                                PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t
                                understand the difference between a
                                NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one
                                has models by antenna gain in dB and
                                the other by antenna size in mm.
                                And of course the NanoStation Loco,
                                why is it Loco? Because it’s crazy small?
                                Then there’s the M vs W thing.
                                My head hurts.
                                *From:* Ben Moore
                                <mailto:[email protected]>
                                *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
                                *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC
                                ubnt line
                                Here you go:
                                Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
                                PTP - PTP only, airPrism
                                PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
                                These are split due to the filtering
                                used for each (maximize PTP and PTMP
                                performance). We won't split unless
                                there is a performance reason to. The
                                cost is same either way...
                                How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
                                On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That
                                One Guy <[email protected]
                                <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                                    The current iteractions of the
                                    rocket AC line, these are the only
                                    connectorized units?
                                    What are the differences between
                                    lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only?
                                    Are some of these shipping without
                                    all there guts?
                                    I am looking at replacing an old
                                    shitbucket tranzeo link, we
                                    already have it connected to one
                                    pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot
                                    HP parabolics. I figure its worth
                                    checking out these AC radios, but
                                    I dont know whats what now, is
                                    this a permanent separation with
                                    UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this
                                    two things that are going to converge?
                                    Other than the Ac component, for a
                                    low throughput demand link is
                                    there any major benefit of going
                                    to the AC over the M5 in terms of
                                    performance? (future demand is a
                                    factor as well)
                                    Also considering the epmp, goods,
                                    bads uglies between the three
                                    products there?
-- If you only see yourself as part
                                    of the team but you don't see your
                                    team as part of yourself you have
                                    already failed as part of the team.





Reply via email to