I really like the new force dishes for Epmp and that is exactly what we are doing with then by tying the rest of our sites together
which will give some more redundancy and a little bandwidth where needed.


On 03/25/2015 01:26 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Chuck,

How much would it cost to make a radome that snaps over the force110 dish? I'd like to have them for light duty backhauls but for CPEs I think it would possibly be cost prohibitive. Right now we're using the subreflector to attach them to the harness, we would need to retain this ability.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:20 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I told them to make a radome with the sub reflector integrated.
    Will they listen, who knows.

    On 3/25/2015 10:51 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
    Is this perhaps a new product opportunity for me?
    �
    *From:* Adam Moffett <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Wednesday, March 25, 2015 9:40 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force 110 backhauls and snow.
    �
    I am picketing with a sign that says "Radome or go home!"


    On 3/25/2015 11:06 AM, Brandon Yuchasz wrote:

    Wondering if anyone has any feedback on the force 110 and snow.
    Specifically I am concerned about the dishes not having radomes
    available and snow sticking to the dish surfaces and causing
    loss. We don�t have a lot of wet sticky snow but we get it a
    few times at the beginning of winter and the end. I figure you
    guys down south of me get a lot more sticky stuff and ice. Any
    experiences would be helpful. On my larger sites I plan to
    deploy 2 foot dishes with radomes but I am trying to convince
    myself I can get by with the forces dishes at some smaller sites.

    �

    �

    Thanks,

    Brandon Yuchasz

    GogebicRange.net

    www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net>

    �





Reply via email to