What about UNII and DFS approvals? Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 8:32 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: > > As per the latest tracking they arrive tomorrow and Thursday. > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >> at US distributors >> >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>> wrote: >>> Arrives where? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 2015 8:30 PM, "Ben Moore" <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >>>> Guys - >>>> >>>> One shipment arrives tomorrow and one on Thursday... >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Josh Luthman >>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>> Well they kept saying they're better at having stock. Several of them >>>>> said March. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 30, 2015 8:23 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> You didn't really think that number would be accurate, did you? >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman >>>>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Well you can wait 2 weeks but after being told 10 days I expected 10 >>>>>>> days. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> So if we don't have them in two weeks we can get out our torches and >>>>>>>> pitchforks? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy >>>>>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not connectorized >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys >>>>>>>>>> actual hands yet is it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard >>>>>>>>>>> <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the >>>>>>>>>>> link? Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as >>>>>>>>>>> well go all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it >>>>>>>>>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have >>>>>>>>>>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will >>>>>>>>>>>>> always be limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going >>>>>>>>>>>>> to be a permanent separation. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they >>>>>>>>>>>>> are going to perform better than the old junk, they also have >>>>>>>>>>>>> some spiffy features like live airview. The biggest downside to >>>>>>>>>>>>> the AC line at this point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at >>>>>>>>>>>>> this point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC >>>>>>>>>>>>> should perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more >>>>>>>>>>>>> flexibility at this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of >>>>>>>>>>>>> them in every way. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> foot HP parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> radios, but I dont know whats what now, is this a permanent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this two things that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the team. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
