That right there made my week Jerry
> On Apr 2, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here ya go guys! It should be obvious what “variables” that you need to > change > > :global MAXTX "20000000"; > :global MAXRX "20000000"; > :global THRESHHOLD "20"; > :global STARTTIME "9:58:00"; > :global USERNAME "admin"; > :global PASSWORD "mypassword"; > :global TESTDEST "8.8.8.8"; > > > /system scheduler > add disabled=no name=bwtest2 on-event=":global \"tx-total-average\";\ > \n\ > \n:global \"rx-total-average\";\ > \n\ > \n:global upspeed 0;\ > \n\ > \n:global downspeed 0;\ > \n\ > \n/tool bandwidth-test $"TESTDEST" user=$"USERNAME" password=$"PASSWORD" > protocol=tcp duration=4s direction=both local-tx-speed=$"MAXTX" \ > remote-tx-speed=$"MAXRX" do={\ > \n\ > \n :set upspeed (\$\"tx-total-average\"/(1024*1024));\ > \n\ > \n :set downspeed (\$\"rx-total-average\"/(1024*1024));\ > \n\ > \n :log warning \"TX is \$\"upspeed\"M, RX is \$\"downspeed\"M\"; \ > \n}\ > \n\ > \n\ > \n\ > \n/tool e-mail send to=\"[email protected]\" subject=([/system identity get > name] . \" bwtest results \" . [/system clock get date]) body=\ > \"Upload \$\"upspeed\"M,Download \$\"downspeed\"M\" \ > \n\ > \n" policy=read,write,test start-date=jan/01/1970 start-time=$"STARTTIME" > interval=24:00:00; > > > > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shayne Lebrun > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Drop in monitoring device for troubleshooting customers > > Can you share this script? Something similar has been on my todo list for > far too long. > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul McCall > Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Drop in monitoring device for troubleshooting customers > > And, its easy to have an automated BW test script on a Mikrotik to test back > to another TIK at a preset interval.. say once every 30 minutes do a 10 or 30 > second BW test. > > We have insisted on Tik’s at every install since Jan 2014. GREATLY improved > abilities to troubleshoot. If say a business customer has a VPN router that > they manage etc, then we put a 951-2n (now the cheaper replacement even) in > with all interfaces bridged that we can monitor. Its worth the $ 40 (now $ > 20) in those instances. > > Most customers get a 951-2HnD or a 2011 at their house or business with the > radio bridged. > > Paul > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 11:44 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Drop in monitoring device for troubleshooting customers > > I drop in a Mikrotik RB941 to customers that have suspected issues. I can > comptletely monitor their entire network that way, WIFI and all. > > > Kurt Fankhauser > Wavelinc Communications > P.O. Box 126 > Bucyrus, OH 44820 > http://www.wavelinc.com > tel. 419-562-6405 > fax. 419-617-0110 > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:41 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm > <[email protected]> wrote: > Im dealing with a customer with what appears to be a legitimate complaint of > slowness, high latency. > > The biggest problem is its happenning at night so its not like we can go to > his house and troubleshoot. The issue doesnt appear to be visible in any of > our monitoring, but we are limited to viewing from this end and not his > > I had him download pingplotter and leave it running to a specific IP so show > us his outbound path when this is going on, but so far it hasnt resulted in > anything useful. > > I do have an air router set up as a monitoring bridge between his 450 and his > router from when we were troubleshooting his 2.4 fsk before we switch him to > 3.65. As far as I can tell this isnt a radio issue, hes always 8x/8x > > Is there any custom load to drop into this air router that would give me some > tools like iperf or any other nifty networking tools that would give me the > equivalent of a console at his house to troubleshoot from? > > We have a bunch of old thin clients laying around here I have considered > dropping some lightweight linux onto for a drop in toolset, is anyone aware > of any specific load for that purpose? > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
