Right … haven’t seen a router in years that didn’t support PPPoE ;)
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 8:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Providing public routed IPs to customers And then customer router has to support PPPoE and we give them the username and other info for the session, correct? Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 04/14/2015 04:41 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: I do PPPoE you don’t need /30’s Just the single IP via the tunnel, local IP can be anything From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 10:33 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Providing public routed IPs to customers Trying to avoid PPPoE, for one. Also want to not do a bunch of /30's everywhere like we are now. Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 04/14/2015 04:30 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: I use DHCP on my fiber network and PPPoE on wireless. On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: For those of you currently providing public/routed ips to customers? What is your topology like and delivery method? Looking at doing a few things, have considered a few options, and wanted to look out there and see what other people are doing. Thanks -- Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com
