It will also change a bit depending on what channel width you're using...
10mhz will gain you a few db over 20mhz, etc.

I'll generally go to a larger antenna on anything over 5-6 miles these
days... actually I won't use NanoBridges for PtP links at all anymore, but
that's another story.

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I'm thinking they may do the same with the tx power as well.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* [email protected]
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 07, 2015 9:29 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nanobridge M5
>
> You did account for the fact that Ubnt antenna gain specs usually add an
> extra 2-3db "in taxes" right?.
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Glen Waldrop" <[email protected]>
> *Sender: *"Af" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Fri, 8 May 2015 01:59:02 +0000
> *To: *<[email protected]>
> *ReplyTo: *[email protected]
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Nanobridge M5
>
> Thanks.
>
> Accounting for 3dB "gain" added for MIMO and 18dBm tx power at full
> modulation makes the math work out for what I'm actually seeing.
>
> Problem is I'm still only at MCS 12, which should be 22dBm tx.
>
> I think they add 3dB to every number on their datasheets accounting for
> MIMO, which doesn't work out quite as nicely when doing the math.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:52 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nanobridge M5
>
> Make sure you account for Tx power at full modulation vs. lowest
> modulation. Always calculate based on full modulation.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Glen Waldrop" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Thursday, May 7, 2015 8:51:49 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Nanobridge M5
>
> 
> I thought so as well. Could be he's talking about the gain being +3dB on
> the data sheets assuming for the gain due to MIMO.
>
> At 12 miles I get a -71. The math shows -61.
>
> Most of my NBM5 links are similar. I get much better signal with my old
> 802.11a + PacWireless grids, usually right on the math.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* John Woodfield <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 07, 2015 8:39 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nanobridge M5
>
> I thought you gained 2db because of MIMO?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John Woodfield, President
>
> Delmarva WiFi Inc.
>
> 410-870-WiFi
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 9:35pm
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nanobridge M5
>
>  Well you're losing 3db because of MIMO.  At least 1db from what the
> antennas say.  What's the signal now?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On May 7, 2015 9:32 PM, "Glen Waldrop" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  I've got a few links out there with the NBM5, longest is around 12
>> miles.
>>
>> According to the math I should get a decent shot at 24 miles, but
>> according to that same math the NBM5 should have higher signal in every
>> single link I've done.
>>
>> My question here is what is the longest link you've done with the NBM5 25
>> and what is the actual gain on these units since they don't seem to
>> actually gain 25 as they're suppose to.
>>
>> I'm not opposed to using a Rocket and larger dish, just trying to
>> see what the actual limits to the device are and what the actual gain is
>> for math.
>>
>> Currently I've got the 24 mile shot with a 29 and 26dBi grids, decent,
>> but still using 2008 MT hardware. I need more speed for growth.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to