Yyyes. I see you tried again over there. Good luck. Lots of mouths, very few ears. Don’t try to convince them not to irrigate their crops with Brawndo.
From: Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 5:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Voltage\Amperage on Shielded Cable I felt like I was on Ars. ;-) BTW: Ken, are you kkken? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Sean Heskett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 5:05:26 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Voltage\Amperage on Shielded Cable Whoops sorry about that! I was reading to fast lol On Sunday, May 10, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: I don't even know what you're saying anymore. You said to run conduit. I said it would be expensive and complicated, but agreed. You then said conduit would be cheaper in the long run as if I disagreed (when I didn't). I confirmed that I agreed. You kept posting as if I was disagreeing with you, but I'm not. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: "Sean Heskett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 4:36:20 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Voltage\Amperage on Shielded Cable Not if you count labor and opportunity cost it isn't On Sunday, May 10, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: I did say it would be cheaper to run conduit than to keep running cable. http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/ProductListing.aspx?catid=104 http://www.sportsmansguide.com/productlist/ammo-shooting/rifle-ammo/22lr-ammo?d=121&c=96&s=2886 ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Sean Heskett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 4:12:06 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Voltage\Amperage on Shielded Cable Depend on if you want a bigger CAPEX or a bigger OPEX I prefer a bigger capital expense and a smaller operating expense. I don't like visiting POPs over and over to fix stuff. 2 cents -Sean On Sunday, May 10, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: That sounds expensive and complicated, though less so than running new wires all of the time. TBH, I'd rather just sit there and shoot them all than run conduit up the grain leg. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Sean Heskett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 3:37:49 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Voltage\Amperage on Shielded Cable I'd run the cable thru liquidtight conduit. On Sunday, May 10, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: How much voltage\amperage on the cable's shield could the radio handle without messing up? Since these squirrels like chewing cables, I'd like to give them a shocking experience! Hook a cheap fence charger to the ground wire of the SS chassis? ;-) Note: I don't actually intend on doing that... not because of the squirrels, but because I don't wanna jack up the radios. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com
