True, airprism is supposed to help with that, not sure how much it actually
does, however.

On Friday, May 15, 2015, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

> With only a few APs per tower because of co-channel interference...
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
> *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Sent: *Friday, May 15, 2015 7:59:14 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
>
> One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*)
>
> Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per sub"
> (*)
>
> (*) under the right conditions
>
> Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important.
>
> Josh Reynolds
> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com
>
> On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>
>  But no sync.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of *Peter
> Kranz
> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM
> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
>
>
>
> AC blows doors on ePMP
>
>
>
>
> *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
> Mobile: 510-207-0000
> [email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of *Jason
> McKemie
> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM
> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
>
>
>
> I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's
> thoughts on these two products?  I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC
> gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near
> future.
>
>
>
> -Jason
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to