I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns on
PTMP, well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability,
consistency, and reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any*
of the wifi stuff. This seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto
is better than a Fiesta.
</smug>
One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*)
Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per
sub" (*)
(*) under the right conditions
Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important.
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
But no sync.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz
*Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
AC blows doors on ePMP
*Peter Kranz
*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-0000
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
*Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are
other's thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I
know the AC gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they
will in the near future.
-Jason
