No, airPrism is useless for co-channel. It's good for adjacent channel.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 8:22:10 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC True, airprism is supposed to help with that, not sure how much it actually does, however. On Friday, May 15, 2015, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: With only a few APs per tower because of co-channel interference... ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 7:59:14 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*) Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per sub" (*) (*) under the right conditions Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important. Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: <blockquote> But no sync. From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC AC blows doors on ePMP Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 [email protected] From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near future. -Jason </blockquote>
