I'd just do 4.0.4 honestly, not much changed in it and it just fixes a
couple off minor bugs.
On May 18, 2015 2:57 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> 4.0.2 is the latest non beta, any problems with that?
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> NX216v2
>> Im slowly onlining OSPF. I have one management subnet thats actually
>> flowing with OSPF. im a baby steps guy when its a pre drunken passed out in
>> bushes weekend week
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Go for it. If you're going to 4.x, I would recommend 4.17, which was
>>> the last version in the 4.x series.
>>>
>>> But I have found that the 5.26 is a bit more robust in the OSPF
>>> department.
>>>
>>> What hardware is this on BTW?
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/18/2015 12:48 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>>>
>>> can I go 3.3.10 to 4.0.2? or do I need to load in order, and is anything
>>> going to break
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Simon Westlake <
>>> simon.westl...@digitalgunfire.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Update to the 4.x firmware line, it was fixed late in 3.x.
>>>>  On May 18, 2015 2:40 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Since I dont expect much forum followup from powercode
>>>>>
>>>>>  Im trying to set my OSPF router ID IP as a loopback UP
>>>>> I create the interface, but when I go to apply the IP is says cant
>>>>> find dummy interface
>>>>>
>>>>>  anybody come across this?
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to