I'd just do 4.0.4 honestly, not much changed in it and it just fixes a couple off minor bugs. On May 18, 2015 2:57 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 4.0.2 is the latest non beta, any problems with that? > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> NX216v2 >> Im slowly onlining OSPF. I have one management subnet thats actually >> flowing with OSPF. im a baby steps guy when its a pre drunken passed out in >> bushes weekend week >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Go for it. If you're going to 4.x, I would recommend 4.17, which was >>> the last version in the 4.x series. >>> >>> But I have found that the 5.26 is a bit more robust in the OSPF >>> department. >>> >>> What hardware is this on BTW? >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> On 5/18/2015 12:48 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> >>> can I go 3.3.10 to 4.0.2? or do I need to load in order, and is anything >>> going to break >>> >>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Simon Westlake < >>> simon.westl...@digitalgunfire.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Update to the 4.x firmware line, it was fixed late in 3.x. >>>> On May 18, 2015 2:40 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Since I dont expect much forum followup from powercode >>>>> >>>>> Im trying to set my OSPF router ID IP as a loopback UP >>>>> I create the interface, but when I go to apply the IP is says cant >>>>> find dummy interface >>>>> >>>>> anybody come across this? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >