Btw, all this advice provided as is, I'm not an employee of Powercode etc etc On May 18, 2015 3:00 PM, "Simon Westlake" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd just do 4.0.4 honestly, not much changed in it and it just fixes a > couple off minor bugs. > On May 18, 2015 2:57 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> 4.0.2 is the latest non beta, any problems with that? >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> NX216v2 >>> Im slowly onlining OSPF. I have one management subnet thats actually >>> flowing with OSPF. im a baby steps guy when its a pre drunken passed out in >>> bushes weekend week >>> >>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Go for it. If you're going to 4.x, I would recommend 4.17, which was >>>> the last version in the 4.x series. >>>> >>>> But I have found that the 5.26 is a bit more robust in the OSPF >>>> department. >>>> >>>> What hardware is this on BTW? >>>> >>>> bp >>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/18/2015 12:48 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>> >>>> can I go 3.3.10 to 4.0.2? or do I need to load in order, and is >>>> anything going to break >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Simon Westlake < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Update to the 4.x firmware line, it was fixed late in 3.x. >>>>> On May 18, 2015 2:40 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Since I dont expect much forum followup from powercode >>>>>> >>>>>> Im trying to set my OSPF router ID IP as a loopback UP >>>>>> I create the interface, but when I go to apply the IP is says cant >>>>>> find dummy interface >>>>>> >>>>>> anybody come across this? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>> team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >
